Cited by 68Distributed systems and fault toleranceIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingCloud Computing and Resource Management

Learning Spatiotemporal Failure Dependencies for Resilient Edge Computing Services

Open access
Aral, Atakan, Brandic, Ivona·2021·IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems

Abstract

Edge computing services are exposed to infrastructural failures due to geographical dispersion, ad hoc deployment, and rudimentary support systems. Two unique characteristics of the edge computing paradigm necessitate a novel failure resilience approach. First, edge servers, contrary to cloud counterparts with reliable data center networks, are typically connected via ad hoc networks. Thus, link failures need more attention to ensure truly resilient services. Second, network delay is a critical factor for the deployment of edge computing services. This restricts replication decisions to geographical proximity and necessitates joint consideration of delay and resilience. In this article, we propose a novel machine learning based mechanism that evaluates the failure resilience of a service deployed redundantly on the edge infrastructure. Our approach learns the spatiotemporal dependencies between edge server failures and combines them with the topological information to incorporate link failures. Ultimately, we infer the probability that a certain set of servers fails or disconnects concurrently during service runtime. Furthermore, we introduce Dependency- and Topology-aware Failure Resilience (DTFR), a two-stage scheduler that minimizes either failure probability or redundancy cost, while maintaining low network delay. Extensive evaluation with various real-world failure traces and workload configurations demonstrate superior performance in terms of availability, number of failures, network delay, and cost with respect to the state-of-the-art schedulers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpds.2020.3046188

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. M. das Chagas Moura, E. Zio, I. D. Lins, and E. Droguett, "Failure and reliability prediction by SVM regression of time series data," Rel. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 96, no. 11, pp. 1527-1534, 2011.
  2. A. Aral and I. Brandic, "QoS Channelling for latency sensitive edge applications," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Edge Comput., 2017, pp. 166-173.
  3. Atakan Aral (Member, IEEE) received the first MSc degree in computer science and engineering from Politecnico di Milano, in 2011, and second MSc degree in computer science and engineering from Istanbul Technical University (ITU), in 2012, and the PhD degree in computer engineering from Istanbul Technical University, in 2016. He is a postdoctoral research fellow with the Vienna University of Technology. His research interests include resource management for geo-distributed and virtualized computing systems such as inter- cloud and edge computing, as well as the optimization of edge comput- ing architecture for AI services.
  4. Ivona Brandi c (Member, IEEE) received the PhD degree from the Vienna University of Tech- nology, in 2007. She is a professor with the Vienna University of Technology. In 2015, she was awarded FWF START prize, the highest Austrian Award for early career researchers. In 2011, she received the Distinguished Young Sci- entist Award from the Vienna University of Tech- nology for her project on the Holistic Energy Efficient Hybrid Clouds. Her main research inter- ests include cloud computing, large scale distrib- uted systems, energy efficiency, quality of service, and autonomic computing.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aral, A., & Brandic, I.
Affiliations
  • TU Wien (AT)
  • Institute of Information Systems Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
Published
2021-07-01
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
1578-1590
ISSN
  • 1045-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2183
  • 2161-9883
OpenAlex
W3114550872
Cited by
68
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Rucon project
  • Austrian Science Fund
  • City of Vienna
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Keywords
edge computing, failure resilience, link failure, ad hoc networks, network latency, topology-aware scheduling, service availability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review