From blockchain consensus back to byzantine consensus
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Practical BFT is prone to Sybil attacks.
“practical BFT is prone to Sybil attacks (one participant maintains many identifiers that can influence this mechanism) [66].”
From A survey on the adoption of blockchain in IoT: challenges and solutions (2021) · cites this paper as [66]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 314
- Authors
- Gramoli, V.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Gramoli, Vincent
- ORCID
- Gramoli, Vincent
- Venue
- Future Generation Computer Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 760-769
- ISSN
- 0167-739X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2758945826
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 14
- FWCI
- 53.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- blockchain consensus, Byzantine consensus, distributed consensus, proof-of-work, Bitcoin, Ethereum, distributed ledger technology, Byzantine fault tolerance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
