IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Common IoT vulnerabilities arise due to complex architecture, inappropriate security configuration, physical security, and insecure firmware or software.
“Common IoT vulnerabilities arise due to the following factors: (a) complex architecture, (b) inappropriate security configuration, (c) physical security, and (d) insecure firmware or software [5].”
From IoT cyber risk: A holistic analysis of cyber risk assessment frameworks, risk vectors, and risk ranking process (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
The green cluster groups authors studying the potentials of blockchain for securing the security and privacy of IoT transactions and information sharing.
“The green cluster groups all authors belonging to the same area of research and studying the potentials of blockchain for securing the security and privacy of IoT transactions and information sharing (Banerjee et al. 2018; Khan and Salah 2018; Makhdoom et al. 2020; Xu et al. 2018).”
From Blockchain technology in the smart city: A bibliometric review (2022) · cites this paper as Khan and Salah 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 153 · Cited by 2,488
- Authors
- Khan, M. A., & Salah, K.
- Affiliations
- Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK)
- Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
- Corresponding author
- Khan, Minhaj Ahmad
- Venue
- Future Generation Computer Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 395-411
- ISSN
- 0167-739X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2768696376
- Cited by
- 2,488
- References
- 153
- Citations by year
- 2026: 108 · 2025: 213 · 2024: 205 · 2023: 300 · 2022: 432 · 2021: 452 · 2020: 406 · 2019: 289 · 2018: 82
- FWCI
- 141.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- Internet of Things security, blockchain, IoT attacks, IoT threats, IoT security protocols, resource-constrained devices, home automation, smart cities, security requirements, open problems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
