CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Authorship Attribution and ProfilingAcademic integrity and plagiarismSpam and Phishing Detection

An integrated approach for intrinsic plagiarism detection

Open access
AlSallal, Muna, Iqbal, Rahat, Palade, Vasile, Amin, Saad, Chang, Victor·2019·Future Generation Computer Systems
DOI 10.1016/j.future.2017.11.023
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2017.11.023

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Abbasi, Ahmed, and Hsinchun Chen. "Writeprints: A stylometric approach to identity-level identification and similarity detection in cyberspace." ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 26, no. 2 (2008): 7.
  2. Alhabashneh, Obada., Iqbal, Rahat., Doctor, Faiyaz., James, Anne., "Fuzzy Rule Based Profiling Approach For Enterprise Information Seeking and Retrieval", (2017), Information Sciences, Elsevier.
  3. Altınel, Berna, Murat Can Ganiz, and Banu Diri. "A corpus-based semantic kernel for text classification by using meaning values of terms." Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 43 (2015): 54-66.
  4. Biber, Douglas. Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  5. Boukhaled, Mohamed Amine, and Jean-Gabriel Ganascia. "Using Function Words for Authorship Attribution: Bag-Of-Words vs. Sequential Rules." Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science: Proceedings 2014 (2015): 115.
  6. Burrows, John F. "Word-patterns and story-shapes: The statistical analysis of narrative style." Literary and linguistic Computing 2, no. 2 (1987): 61-70.
  7. Burrows, John. "'Delta': A measure of stylistic difference and a guide to likely authorship." Literary and linguistic computing 17, no. 3 (2002): 267-287.
  8. Ceska, Zdenek. "Automatic plagiarism detection based on latent semantic analysis." PhD diss., Ph. D. dissertation, Faculty Appl Sci., Univ. West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czech Republic, 2009.
  9. Cosma, Georgina, and Mike Joy. "An approach to source-code plagiarism detection and investigation using latent semantic analysis." IEEE transactions on computers 61, no. 3 (2012): 379-394.
  10. Diederich, Joachim, Jörg Kindermann, Edda Leopold, and Gerhard Paass. "Authorship attribution with support vector machines." Applied intelligence 19, no. 1-2 (2003): 109-123.
  11. Edmunds, Angela, and Anne Morris. "The problem of information overload in business organisations: a review of the literature." International journal of information management 20, no. 1 (2000): 17-28.
  12. Fucks, Wilhelm. "On mathematical analysis of style." Biometrika 39, no. 1/2 (1952): 122-129.
  13. Kakkonen, Tuomo, and Maxim Mozgovoy. "Hermetic and web plagiarism detection systems for student essays-an evaluation of the state-of-the-art." Journal of Educational Computing Research 42, no. 2 (2010): 135-159.
  14. Koch, Mark W., Mary M. Moya, Larry D. Hostetler, and R. Joseph Fogler. "Cueing, feature discovery, and one-class learning for synthetic aperture radar automatic target recognition." Neural Networks 8, no. 7 (1995): 1081-1102.
  15. Koppel, Moshe, and Jonathan Schler. "Authorship verification as a one-class classification problem." In Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning, p. 62. ACM, 2004.
  16. Koppel, Moshe, Jonathan Schler, and Kfir Zigdon. "Determining an author's native language by mining a text for errors." In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining, pp. 624-628. ACM, 2005.
  17. Landauer, Thomas K., Peter W. Foltz, and Darrell Laham. "An introduction to latent semantic analysis." Discourse processes 25, no. 2-3 (1998): 259-284.
  18. Luyckx, Kim, and Walter Daelemans. "Authorship attribution and verification with many authors and limited data." In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 1, pp. 513- 520. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008.
  19. Merriam, Thomas VN, and Robert AJ Matthews. "Neural computation in stylometry II: An application to the works of Shakespeare and Marlowe." Literary and Linguistic Computing 9, no. 1 (1994): 1-6.
  20. Oakes, Michael P., and Meng Ji, eds. Quantitative methods in corpus-based Translation Studies: A practical guide to descriptive translation research. Vol. 51. John Benjamins Publishing, 2012.
  21. Roberts, Stephen, and Lionel Tarassenko. "A probabilistic resource allocating network for novelty detection." Neural Computation 6, no. 2 (1994): 270-284.
  22. Salton, Gerard, Anita Wong, and Chung-Shu Yang. "A vector space model for automatic indexing." Communications of the ACM 18, no. 11 (1975): 613-620.
  23. Sebastiani, F., 2002. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 34(1), pp.1-47.
  24. Stamatatos, Efstathios. "A survey of modern authorship attribution methods." Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology 60, no. 3 (2009): 538-556.
  25. Tax, David MJ, and Robert PW Duin. "Uniform object generation for optimizing one-class classifiers." Journal of Machine Learning Research 2, no. Dec (2001): 155-173.
  26. Tweedie, Fiona J., Sameer Singh, and David I. Holmes. "Neural network applications in stylometry: The Federalist Papers." Computers and the Humanities 30, no. 1 (1996): 1-10.
  27. Yule, G. Udny. "On sentence-length as a statistical characteristic of style in prose: With application to two cases of disputed authorship." Biometrika 30, no. 3/4 (1939): 363-390.
  28. Zechner, Mario, Markus Muhr, Roman Kern, and Michael Granitzer. "External and intrinsic plagiarism detection using vector space models." In Proc. SEPLN, vol. 32, pp. 47-55. 2009.
  29. Zhao, Ying, and Justin Zobel. "Searching with style: authorship attribution in classic literature." In Proceedings of the thirtieth Australasian conference on Computer science-Volume 62, pp. 59-68. Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2007.
  30. Zu Eissen, Sven Meyer, Benno Stein, and Marion Kulig. "Plagiarism detection without reference collections." In Advances in data analysis, pp. 359-366. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
  31. Zurini, Madalina. "Stylometry Metrics Selection for Creating a Model for Evaluating the Writing Style of Authors According to Their Cultural Orientation." Informatica Economica 19, no. 3 (2015): 107.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AlSallal, M., Iqbal, R., Palade, V., Amin, S., & Chang, V.
Affiliations
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
Corresponding author
Iqbal, Rahat
ORCID
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
96
Pages
700-712
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.future.2017.11.023
OpenAlex
W2774570661
Cited by
48
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
Keywords
plagiarism detection, stylometry, latent semantic analysis, authorship attribution, multilayer perceptron

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review