The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A deep Recurrent Neural Network based approach for Internet of Things malware threat hunting
Abstract
Abstract Internet of Things (IoT) devices are increasingly deployed in different industries and for different purposes (e.g. sensing/collecting of environmental data in both civilian and military settings). The increasing presence in a broad range of applications, and their increasing computing and processing capabilities make them a valuable attack target, such as malware designed to compromise specific IoT devices. In this paper, we explore the potential of using Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) deep learning in detecting IoT malware. Specifically, our approach uses RNN to analyze ARM-based IoT applications’ execution operation codes (OpCodes). To train our models, we use an IoT application dataset comprising 281 malware and 270 benign ware. Then, we evaluate the trained model using 100 new IoT malware samples (i.e. not previously exposed to the model) with three different Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) configurations. Findings of the 10-fold cross validation analysis show that the second configuration with 2-layer neurons has the highest accuracy (98.18%) in the detection of new malware samples. A comparative summary with other machine learning classifiers also demonstrate that the LSTM approach delivers the best possible outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Bidirectional recurrent neural networks
Schuster, M., & Paliwal, K. K. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.650093 · Cited by 10,172
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582924 · Cited by 6,955
Approximate nearest neighbors: towards removing the curse of dimensionality
Indyk, P., & Motwani, R. (1998) · Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '98 · doi:10.1145/276698.276876 · Cited by 4,188
A neural probabilistic language model
BengioYoshua, DucharmeRéjean, VincentPascal, & JanvinChristian (2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944966 · Cited by 2,644
Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM
Gers, F. A. (1999) · 9th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks: ICANN '99 · doi:10.1049/cp:19991218 · Cited by 2,337
Cited by
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
Intrusion Detection for IoT Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm and Deep Belief Network
Zhang, Y., Li, P., & Wang, X. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2903723 · Cited by 359
Internet of things forensics: Recent advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open challenges
Yaqoob, I., Hashem, I. A. T., Ahmed, A., Kazmi, S. M. A., & Hong, C. S. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.09.058 · Cited by 322
Internet of Things: Evolution, Concerns and Security Challenges
Malhotra, P., Singh, Y., Anand, P., Bangotra, D. K., Singh, P. K., & Hong, W.-C. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21051809 · Cited by 260
Ahmad, S., Shakeel, I., Mehfuz, S., & Ahmad, J. (2023) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100568 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- HaddadPajouh, H., Dehghantanha, A., Khayami, R., & Choo, K.-K. R.
- Venue
- Future Generation Computer Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 88-96
- ISSN
- 0167-739X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2791879367
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 38.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A deep Recurrent Neural Network based approach for Internet of Things malware threat hunting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.future.2018.03.007
- The paper
- HaddadPajouh, H., Dehghantanha, A., Khayami, R., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2018). A deep Recurrent Neural Network based approach for Internet of Things malware threat hunting. Future Generation Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.03.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
