Cited by 197IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AICloud Computing and Resource Management

Deep learning models for cloud, edge, fog, and IoT computing paradigms: Survey, recent advances, and future directions

Ahmad, Shahnawaz, Shakeel, Iman, Mehfuz, Shabana, Ahmad, Javed·2023·Computer Science Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100568

Cites

380 of 380 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad, S., Shakeel, I., Mehfuz, S., & Ahmad, J.
Affiliations
  • Jamia Hamdard (IN)
  • Jamia Millia Islamia (IN)
Corresponding author
Ahmad, Shahnawaz
Venue
Computer Science Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
49
Pages
100568
ISSN
1574-0137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378190897
Cited by
197
References
380
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 12
FWCI
20.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Science Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jamia Millia Islamia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Keywords
deep learning, cloud computing, edge computing, fog computing, Internet of Things, latency reduction, energy consumption, resource management, privacy, open problems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review