CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 456Corporate Management and LeadershipEducation, Management, Technology, Human ResourcesDigital literacy in education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Digital learning: Developing skills for digital transformation of organizations

Sousa, Maria José, Rocha, Álvaro·2019·Future Generation Computer Systems
DOI 10.1016/j.future.2018.08.048
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2018.08.048

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Kyndt, 2009, Employee retention: organizational and personal perspectives, Vocat. Learn., 2, 195, 10.1007/s12186-009-9024-7 · DOI
  2. Van Biesen, 1989, Every day learning in labour organizations, Ontwerp, 1, 4
  3. Sousa, 2017, Game-Based learning contexts for soft skills development, vol. 570
  4. M.J. Sousa, R. Cruz, J.M. Martins, Digital learning methodologies and tools – a literature review, in: Edulearn17 Proceedings (2017), pp. 5185-5192. · DOI
  5. A.C. Gonçalves, M.J. Sousa. R. Cruz, Designing higher education digital course to boost entrepreneurship competencies, in: Edulearn17 Proceedings, 2017. · DOI
  6. Brem, 2009, Integration of market-pull and technology-push in the corporate front end and innovation management — insights from the German software industry, Technovation, 29, 351, 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.06.003 · DOI
  7. Chui, 2010, The internet of things, McKinsey Quart.
  8. Sun, 2012, A holistic approach to visualizing business models for the internet of things, Commun. Mob. Comput., 1, 1, 10.1186/2192-1121-1-4 · DOI
  9. Hui, 2014, How the internet of things changes business models, Harv. Bus. Rev.
  10. Mulder, 2001, Competence development – some background thoughts, J. Agricul. Educ. Extension, 7, 147, 10.1080/13892240108438822 · DOI
  11. Mulder, 2006, The concept of competence concept in the development of vocational education and training in selected eu member states. a critical analysis, J. Vocational Educ. Train., 59, 65
  12. Norris, 1991, The trouble with competence, Cambridge J. Educ., 21, 331, 10.1080/0305764910210307 · DOI
  13. Ellström, 1997, The many meanings of occupational competence and qualification, J. Eur. Ind. Train., 21, 266, 10.1108/03090599710171567 · DOI
  14. Nyhan, 1998, Competence development as a key organisational strategy experiences of european companies, Ind. Commer. Train., 30, 267, 10.1108/00197859810242897 · DOI
  15. Porter, 2014, How smart, connected products are transforming competition, Harv. Bus. Rev.
  16. Mejia, 2014, Software process improvement in organizations through process management, outsourcing and adoption of information and communication technologies, RISTI-Rev. Ibérica Sistemas Tecnol. Inf., 1, 7
  17. Gonçalves, 2016, Information management model for competencies and learning outcomes in an educational context, Inf. Syst. Front., 18, 1051, 10.1007/s10796-016-9623-4 · DOI
  18. Routley, 2013, Exploring industry dynamics and interactions, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 80, 1147, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.015 · DOI
  19. Sousa, 2018, Corporate digital learning — Proposal of learning analytics model, vol. 745
  20. Barber, 2015, Problem based learning and authentic assessment, Electr. J. e-Learn., 13, 59
  21. Chen, 2015, Student’s perspectives of using cooperative learning in a flipped statistics classroom, Australas. J. Educ. Technol., 31, 621, 10.14742/ajet.1876 · DOI
  22. Trotskovsky, 2015, One output function: a misconception of students studying digital systems - a case study, Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., 33, 131, 10.1080/02635143.2014.983468 · DOI
  23. Munoz Gonzales, 2015, Strategies of collaborative work in the classroom through the design of video games, Digit. Educ. Rev., 27, 69
  24. Sohrabi, 2016, Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: a comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions, Comput. Hum. Behav., 60, 514, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.056 · DOI
  25. Liwen, 2015, Students’ perspectives of using cooperative learning in a flipped statistics classroom, Australas. J. Educ. Technol., 31, 621
  26. Thibaut, 2015, Moving across physical and online spaces: a case study in a blended primary classrom, Learn. Media Technol., 40, 458, 10.1080/17439884.2014.959971 · DOI
  27. Salmon, 2015, Experiential online development for educators: The example of the Carpe Diem MOOC, Br. J. Educ. Technol., 46, 543, 10.1111/bjet.12256 · DOI
  28. Masterman, 2016, Bringing open education practice to a research-intensive university: prospects and challenges, Electr. J. e-Learn., 14, 31
  29. Stewart, 2015, Open to influence: what counts as an academic influence in scholarly networked twitter participation, Learn. Media Technol., 40, 287, 10.1080/17439884.2015.1015547 · DOI
  30. Liyanagunawardena, 2015, Who are with us: MOOC learners on a Future Learn course, Br. J. Educ. Technol., 46, 557, 10.1111/bjet.12261 · DOI
  31. Tena, 2016, E-Learning of andalusian university’s lecturers, Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol., 15, 25
  32. Sungkur, 2016, Augmented reality, the future of contextual mobile learning, Interact. Technol. Smart Educ., 13, 123, 10.1108/ITSE-07-2015-0017 · DOI
  33. Xu, 2016, Faculty use of a learning object repository in higher education, J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. Syst., 46, 469
  34. Martin-Garcia, 2014, Fases y clasificación de adoptantes de blended learning en contextos universitarios. Aplicación del análisis CHAID, Rev. Esp. Pedagog., 72, 457
  35. Guzman, 2014, Uso de gestores de aprendizaje en el pregrado de la universidad nacional abierta de venezuela, Apertura: Rev. Innovación Educ., 6, 1
  36. McNaughton, 2014, Exploring teachers’ perceptions of videoconferencing practice through space, movement and the material and virtual environments, Int. J. Mult. Res. Approaches, 8, 87, 10.5172/mra.2014.8.1.87 · DOI
  37. Moorefielf-Lang, 2015, Instruction on the go: reaching out to students from the academic library, J. Lib. Inf. Serv. Distance Learn., 9, 57, 10.1080/1533290X.2014.946347 · DOI
  38. Alhajri, 2016, The effectiveness of teaching method used in graphic design pedagogy, Univ. J. Edu. Res., 4, 422
  39. Rudow, 2015, The use of web-based video for instruction of GIS and other digital geographic methods, J. Geogr., 114, 168
  40. Unger, 2016, Integrating faculty-led service learning training to quantify height of natual resources from a spacial science perspective, Int. J. Higher Educ., 5, 104, 10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p104 · DOI
  41. Nielsen, 2015, Designing a digital teaching resource to explain phases of the moon: a case study of preservice elementary teachers making a slowmation, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 52, 1207, 10.1002/tea.21242 · DOI
  42. Kosonen, 2015, Using a modelling language for supporting university students’ orienting activity when studying research methods, J. Interact. Media Educ., 1, 8
  43. Friend, 2014, Lights, camera, action: advancing learning research and program evaluation through video production in educational leadership preparation, J. Res. Leadersh. Educ., 10, 81, 10.1177/1942775114561120 · DOI
  44. Wood, 2014, I am not a person with a creative mind: facilitating creativity in the undergraduate curriculum through a design-based research approach, Electr. J. e-Learn., 12, 111
  45. Stansbury, 2017, Meaningful gamification in an industrial/organizational psychology course, Teach. Psychol., 44, 38, 10.1177/0098628316677645 · DOI
  46. Rai, 2014, A research paper on simulation model for teaching and learning process in higher education, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Res., 4, 582
  47. Lau, 2014, Computer-based teaching module design: principles derived from learning theories, Med. Educ., 48, 247, 10.1111/medu.12357 · DOI
  48. Epure, 2017, Critical considerations about the adoption of technology integrated teaching methods in higher education. eLearn, Softw. Educ., 2, 77
  49. Kocaman-Karoglu, 2016, Personal voices in higher education: a digital storytelling experience for pre-service teachers, Educ. Inf. Technol., 21, 1153, 10.1007/s10639-014-9373-1 · DOI
  50. Abdulmajed, 2015, Assessment of educational games for health professions: a systematic review of trends and outcomes, Med. Teacher, 37, S27, 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1006609 · DOI
  51. Mantri, 2014, Working towards a scalable model of problem-based learning instruction in undergraduate engineering education, Eur. J. Eng. Educ., 39, 282, 10.1080/03043797.2013.858106 · DOI
  52. Amory, 2014, Tool-mediated authentic learning in an educational technology course: a designed-based innovation, Interact. Learn. Environ., 22, 497, 10.1080/10494820.2012.682584 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 456

Metadata

Authors
Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á.
Affiliations
  • Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos (PT)
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
Corresponding author
Sousa, Maria José
ORCID
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
91
Pages
327-334
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.future.2018.08.048
OpenAlex
W2890839159
Cited by
456
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 16
FWCI
43.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Associação Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação/Iberian Association for Information Systems and Technologies, Portugal
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Education, Management, Technology, Human Resources
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
Keywords
digital transformation, online learning, skill development, organizational skills, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, robotization, Internet of Things, augmented reality, mobile learning, smartphones, tablets, employee perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital learning: Developing skills for digital transformation of organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.future.2018.08.048
The paper
Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á. (2019). Digital learning: Developing skills for digital transformation of organizations. Future Generation Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.08.048