The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intelligent mobile malware detection using permission requests and API calls
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Malware is a serious threat that has been used to target mobile devices since its inception. Two types of mobile malware attacks are standalone: fraudulent mobile apps and injected malicious apps. Defending against the cyber threats of mobile malware requires a strong understanding of the permissions declared in applications and application programmeinterface (API) calls. In this paper, we propose an effective classification model that combines permission requests and API calls. As Android apps use a large number of APIs, we propose three different grouping strategies for choosing the most valuable API calls to maximize the likelihood of identifying Android malware apps: the ambiguous group, risky group, and disruptive group. The results demonstrate that compared with benign apps, malicious applications invoke a different set of API calls and that mobile malware often requests dangerous permissions to access sensitive data more often than benign apps. Empirical results obtained with a real malware dataset containing 27,891 Android apps suggest that our proposed method is effective at detecting mobile malware apps and achieves an F-measure of 94.3%. Our model can significantly assist in the process of malware forensic investigation and mobile application analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cyber risk and cybersecurity: a systematic review of data availability
Cremer, F., Sheehan, B., Fortmann, M., Kia, A. N., Mullins, M., Murphy, F., & Materne, S. (2022) · The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice · doi:10.1057/s41288-022-00266-6 · Cited by 355
A Novel Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System for IoT Networks
Awajan, A. (2023) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers12020034 · Cited by 292
Self-citationBlockchain for Edge of Things: Applications, Opportunities, and Challenges
Gadekallu, T. R., Pham, Q.-V., Nguyen, D. C., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Deepa, N., Prabadevi, B., Pathirana, P. N., Zhao, J., & Hwang, W.-J. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3119639 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Alazab, M., Alazab, M., Shalaginov, A., Mesleh, A., & Awajan, A.
- Venue
- Future Generation Computer Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 509-521
- ISSN
- 0167-739X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3004549544
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intelligent mobile malware detection using permission requests and API calls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.future.2020.02.002
- The paper
- Alazab, M., Alazab, M., Shalaginov, A., Mesleh, A., & Awajan, A. (2020). Intelligent mobile malware detection using permission requests and API calls. Future Generation Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.02.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.