Cited by 217Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

Blockchain for Edge of Things: Applications, Opportunities, and Challenges

Open access
Gadekallu, Thippa Reddy, Pham, Quoc-Viet, Nguyen, Dinh C., Maddikunta, Praveen Kumar Reddy, Deepa, N., Prabadevi, B., Pathirana, Pubudu N., Zhao, Jun +1 more·2022·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

In recent years, blockchain networks have attracted significant attention in many research areas beyond cryptocurrency, one of them being the Edge of Things (EoT) that is enabled by the combination of edge computing and the Internet of Things (IoT). In this context, blockchain networks enabled with unique features, such as decentralization, immutability, and traceability, have the potential to reshape and transform the conventional EoT systems with higher security levels. Particularly, the convergence of blockchain and EoT leads to a new paradigm, calledBEoTthat has been regarded as a promising enabler for future services and applications. In this article, we present a state-of-the-art review of recent developments in the BEoT technology and discover its great opportunities in many application domains. We start our survey by providing an updated introduction to blockchain and EoT along with their recent advances. Subsequently, we discuss the use of BEoT in a wide range of industrial applications, from smart transportation, smart city, smart healthcare to smart home, and smart grid. Security challenges in the BEoT paradigm are also discussed and analyzed, with some key services, such as access authentication, data privacy preservation, attack detection, and trust management. Finally, some key research challenges and future directions are also highlighted to instigate further research in this promising area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2021.3119639

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The software and hardware manufacturers would get a lot of benefits from the FL because collaborative learning is possible between hardware devices and software applications without information leakage and the other benefit will come in terms of validation of the AI-based model since it is combined with the hardware devices that helps in continuous improvement of AI-based models.

    “The software and hardware manufacturers would get a lot of benefits from the FL because collaborative learning is possible between hardware devices and software applications without information leakage and the other benefit will come in terms of validation of the AI-based model since it is combined with the hardware devices that helps in continuous improvement of AI-based models [110].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gadekallu, T. R., Pham, Q.-V., Nguyen, D. C., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Deepa, N., Prabadevi, B., Pathirana, P. N., Zhao, J., & Hwang, W.-J.
Affiliations
  • Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
  • Pusan National University (KR)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2022-01-15
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
964-988
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3207929292
Cited by
217
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 44
FWCI
35.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Korean Government (NRF-2019R1C1C1006143, NRF-2019R1I1A3A01060518)
  • Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation
  • Korea Government (2020-0-01450)
  • Artificial Intelligence Convergence Research Center [Pusan National University])
  • Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), South Korea
  • Grand Information Technology Research Center Support Program
  • Institute for Information Communications, Technology, Planning and Evaluation (IITP-2021-2016-0-00318)
  • BK21 Four, Korean Southeast Center for the 4th Industrial Revolution Leader Education
  • Pusan National University Research Grant, 2020
  • Nanyang Technological University Startup Grant
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain, edge computing, Internet of Things, decentralization (distributed systems), immutability, traceability, security challenges, access authentication, data privacy, attack detection, trust management, smart transportation, smart cities, smart healthcare, home automation, smart grid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review