The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new network forensic framework based on deep learning for Internet of Things networks: A particle deep framework
Abstract
Abstract With the prevalence of Internet of Things (IoT) systems, inconspicuous everyday household devices are connected to the Internet, providing automation and real-time services to their users. In spite of their light-weight design and low power, their vulnerabilities often give rise to cyber risks that harm their operations over network systems. One of the key challenges of securing IoT networks is tracing sources of cyber-attack events, along with obfuscating and encrypting network traffic. This study proposes a new network forensics framework , called a Particle Deep Framework (PDF), which describes the digital investigation phases for identifying and tracing attack behaviors in IoT networks. The proposed framework includes three new functions: (1) extracting network data flows and verifying their integrity to deal with encrypted networks; (2) utilizing a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm to automatically adapt parameters of deep learning; and (3) developing a Deep Neural Network (DNN) based on the PSO algorithm to discover and trace abnormal events from IoT network of smart homes. The proposed PDF is evaluated using the Bot-IoT and UNSW_NB15 datasets and compared with various deep learning techniques. Experimental results reveal a high performance of the proposed framework for discovering and tracing cyber-attack events compared with the other techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
A Deep Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Yin, C., Zhu, Y., Fei, J., & He, X. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2762418 · Cited by 2,100
Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labels
Zhang, Z., & Sabuncu, M. R. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.07836 · Cited by 1,907
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
Cyber and Physical Security Vulnerability Assessment for IoT-Based Smart Homes
Ali, B., & Awad, A. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18030817 · Cited by 344
Cebe, M., Erdin, E., Akkaya, K., Aksu, H., & Uluagac, S. (2018) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.1800137 · Cited by 326
Cited by
Cyber risk and cybersecurity: a systematic review of data availability
Cremer, F., Sheehan, B., Fortmann, M., Kia, A. N., Mullins, M., Murphy, F., & Materne, S. (2022) · The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice · doi:10.1057/s41288-022-00266-6 · Cited by 355
Ferrag, M. A., Friha, O., Maglaras, L., Janicke, H., & Shu, L. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3118642 · Cited by 342
Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection for Distributed Denial of Service Attack in Agriculture 4.0
Ferrag, M. A., Shu, L., Djallel, H., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10111257 · Cited by 253
Intrusion Detection in the IoT Under Data and Concept Drifts: Online Deep Learning Approach
Abdel Wahab, O. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3167005 · Cited by 190
Cybersecurity for Industrial IoT (IIoT): Threats, countermeasures, challenges and future directions
Mekala, S. H., Baig, Z., Anwar, A., & Zeadally, S. (2023) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2023.06.020 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Koroniotis, N., Moustafa, N., & Sitnikova, E.
- Venue
- Future Generation Computer Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 110
- Pages
- 91-106
- ISSN
- 0167-739X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3014810737
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 27.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.