The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ABCDM: An Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model for sentiment analysis
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Sentiment analysis has been a hot research topic in natural language processing and data mining fields in the last decade. Recently, deep neural network (DNN) models are being applied to sentiment analysis tasks to obtain promising results. Among various neural architectures applied for sentiment analysis, long short-term memory (LSTM) models and its variants such as gated recurrent unit (GRU) have attracted increasing attention. Although these models are capable of processing sequences of arbitrary length, using them in the feature extraction layer of a DNN makes the feature space high dimensional. Another drawback of such models is that they consider different features equally important. To address these problems, we propose an Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model (ABCDM). By utilizing two independent bidirectional LSTM and GRU layers, ABCDM will extract both past and future contexts by considering temporal information flow in both directions. Also, the attention mechanism is applied on the outputs of bidirectional layers of ABCDM to put more or less emphasis on different words. To reduce the dimensionality of features and extract position-invariant local features, ABCDM utilizes convolution and pooling mechanisms. The effectiveness of ABCDM is evaluated on sentiment polarity detection which is the most common and essential task of sentiment analysis. Experiments were conducted on five review and three Twitter datasets. The results of comparing ABCDM with six recently proposed DNNs for sentiment analysis show that ABCDM achieves state-of-the-art results on both long review and short tweet polarity classification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification
Kim, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1181 · Cited by 14,831
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.57702/o9raffed · Cited by 14,214
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25
Zhang, Y., Sutton, C. A., Storkey, A., & Zoubin Ghahramani, A. (2012) · Cited by 12,653
Hierarchical Attention Networks for Document Classification
Yang, Z., Yang, D., Dyer, C., He, X., Smola, A., & Hovy, E. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1174 · Cited by 4,712
ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations
Lan, Z., Chen, M., Goodman, S., Gimpel, K., Sharma, P., & Soricut, R. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11942 · Cited by 4,308
A Convolutional Neural Network for Modelling Sentences
Kalchbrenner, N., Grefenstette, E., & Blunsom, P. (2014) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1062 · Cited by 3,601
Cited by
Deep Learning--based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Review
Minaee, S., Kalchbrenner, N., Cambria, E., Nikzad, N., Chenaghlu, M., & Gao, J. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3439726 · Cited by 1,538
Self-citationA survey on sentiment analysis methods, applications, and challenges
Wankhade, M., Rao, A. C. S., & Kulkarni, C. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-022-10144-1 · Cited by 1,528
Deep learning modelling techniques: Current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges
Ahmed, S. F., Alam, M. S. B., Hassan, M., Rozbu, M. R., Ishtiak, T., Rafa, N., Mofijur, M., Shawkat Ali, A. B. M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10466-8 · Cited by 1,079
Babu, N. V., & Kanaga, E. G. M. (2022) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00958-1 · Cited by 303
Fuzzy logic applied to opinion mining: A review
Serrano-Guerrero, J., Romero, F. P., & Olivas, J. A. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107018 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Basiri, M. E., Nemati, S., Abdar, M., Cambria, E., & Acharya, U. R.
- Venue
- Future Generation Computer Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 115
- Pages
- 279-294
- ISSN
- 0167-739X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3081987387
- Cited by
- 745
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 44.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ABCDM: An Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model for sentiment analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.future.2020.08.005
- The paper
- Basiri, M. E., Nemati, S., Abdar, M., Cambria, E., & Acharya, U. R. (2021). ABCDM: An Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model for sentiment analysis. Future Generation Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.08.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
