Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 745

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ABCDM: An Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model for sentiment analysis

Open access
Basiri, Mohammad Ehsan, Nemati, Shahla, Abdar, Moloud, Cambria, Erik, Acharya, U. Rajendra·2021·Future Generation Computer Systems

Abstract

Abstract Sentiment analysis has been a hot research topic in natural language processing and data mining fields in the last decade. Recently, deep neural network (DNN) models are being applied to sentiment analysis tasks to obtain promising results. Among various neural architectures applied for sentiment analysis, long short-term memory (LSTM) models and its variants such as gated recurrent unit (GRU) have attracted increasing attention. Although these models are capable of processing sequences of arbitrary length, using them in the feature extraction layer of a DNN makes the feature space high dimensional. Another drawback of such models is that they consider different features equally important. To address these problems, we propose an Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model (ABCDM). By utilizing two independent bidirectional LSTM and GRU layers, ABCDM will extract both past and future contexts by considering temporal information flow in both directions. Also, the attention mechanism is applied on the outputs of bidirectional layers of ABCDM to put more or less emphasis on different words. To reduce the dimensionality of features and extract position-invariant local features, ABCDM utilizes convolution and pooling mechanisms. The effectiveness of ABCDM is evaluated on sentiment polarity detection which is the most common and essential task of sentiment analysis. Experiments were conducted on five review and three Twitter datasets. The results of comparing ABCDM with six recently proposed DNNs for sentiment analysis show that ABCDM achieves state-of-the-art results on both long review and short tweet polarity classification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2020.08.005

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 745

Metadata

Authors
Basiri, M. E., Nemati, S., Abdar, M., Cambria, E., & Acharya, U. R.
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
115
Pages
279-294
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3081987387
Cited by
745
References
80
FWCI
44.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.