Cited by 252UAV Applications and OptimizationHealthcare during COVID-19 PandemicWireless Body Area Networks

A drone-based networked system and methods for combating coronavirus disease (covid-19) pandemic

Open access
Kumar, Adarsh, Sharma, Kriti, Singh, Harvinder, Naugriya, Sagar Gupta, Gill, Sukhpal Singh, Buyya, Rajkumar·2021·Future Generation Computer Systems

Abstract

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus. It is similar to influenza viruses and raises concerns through alarming levels of spread and severity resulting in an ongoing pandemic worldwide. Within eight months (by August 2020), it infected 24.0 million persons worldwide and over 824 thousand have died. Drones or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are very helpful in handling the COVID-19 pandemic. This work investigates the drone-based systems, COVID-19 pandemic situations, and proposes an architecture for handling pandemic situations in different scenarios using real-time and simulation-based scenarios. The proposed architecture uses wearable sensors to record the observations in Body Area Networks (BANs) in a push-pull data fetching mechanism. The proposed architecture is found to be useful in remote and highly congested pandemic areas where either the wireless or Internet connectivity is a major issue or chances of COVID-19 spreading are high. It collects and stores the substantial amount of data in a stipulated period and helps to take appropriate action as and when required. In real-time drone-based healthcare system implementation for COVID-19 operations, it is observed that a large area can be covered for sanitization, thermal image collection, and patient identification within a short period (2 KMs within 10 min approx.) through aerial route. In the simulation, the same statistics are observed with an addition of collision-resistant strategies working successfully for indoor and outdoor healthcare operations. Further, open challenges are identified and promising research directions are highlighted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2020.08.046

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In drone scenarios, drones can make smarter decisions, such as whether to send all data to the cloud or process it onboard.

    “In this scenario, drones themselves can make smarter decisions, for example, whether it sends the whole data to the cloud or completes the data processing on board [155].”

    From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [155]

    The “Drone-System” and “Edge Network and Computing System” passages in “A drone-based architecture for smart healthcare system” describe initial processing on the drone and sending necessary data onward for further processing. They do not describe a drone choosing between sending all data to the cloud and completing all processing onboard; the local-versus-remote decision is assigned to the edge system. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inherent problems of drones are significant challenges such as limited flight duration due to short battery lifetime, limited CPU resource and memory, and security concerns.

    “Despite the beneficial use of drones in smart cities, the inherent problems of drones are also significant challenges such as limited flight duration due to short battery lifetime, limited CPU resource and memory, and security concerns [7,155,156].”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [156]

    In Performance evaluation, Case 1 (page unavailable), Table 3 reports flight times of 12–15 or 35–40 minutes for the paper’s drone; Case 2 also notes that recharging time is additional. Open challenges and future directions calls for security protocols and further security analysis. These passages support flight-duration and security concerns, but do not establish short battery lifetime as the cause or identify limited onboard CPU and memory as challenges. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • China has recently exploited the mobility of drones to improve the provisions of medical supplies.

    “More interesting, China has recently exploited the mobility of drones [173] to improve the provisions of medical supplies [174].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Hopkins C. Kumar N. Loss of Sense of Smell As Marker of COVID-19 Infection 2020 Ent Uk 19 20 PMC7436734 32741085
  2. [22]Wickramasinghe N. F T. Bodendorf R. Delivering Superior Health and Wellness Management with Iot and Analytics 2020 Springer International Publishing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, A., Sharma, K., Singh, H., Naugriya, S. G., Gill, S. S., & Buyya, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (IN)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Adarsh
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
115
Pages
1-19
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035681721
Cited by
252
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 16
FWCI
32.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, unmanned aerial vehicles, body area networks, wearable sensors, remote care, infrared thermography, sanitization, patient identification, collision avoidance, wireless connectivity, data collection architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review