The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RETRACTED: Determination of Ni(II) uptake mechanisms on mordenite surfaces: A combined macroscopic and microscopic approach
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The uptake mechanisms of Ni(II) on mordenite were investigated by macroscopic experiments and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy. The results demonstrated that Ni(II) could be retained via different mechanisms, depending on pH, ionic strength, temperature, etc. At low pH, the uptake of Ni(II) is primarily dominated by cation exchange and/or outer-sphere surface complexation. The interatomic distances of Ni–O (∼2.05 A) and the coordination number (∼6.0) are similar to those of Ni(II)(aq) reference sample, suggesting that Ni(II) is present in an [Ni(H 2 O) 6 ] 2+ octahedral environment at low pH. With increasing pH, the uptake of Ni(II) on mordenite tends to form inner-sphere surface complexes and precipitation/co-precipitation at high pH. The uptake of Ni(II) on mordenite becomes more favorable with increasing temperature, and the EXAFS spectra analysis show a trend from outer-sphere surface complexation at low temperature to inner-sphere surface complexation at high temperature. The addition of HA/FA increases Ni(II) uptake at low pH and decreases Ni(II) uptake at high pH. Enhanced Ni(II) uptake is attributed to the formation of “ligand-bridging” ternary surface complexes that are adsorbed on mordenite surface, while reduction is attributed to the formation of soluble Ni(II)–HA/FA complexes in solution that compete with uptake processes. The findings presented in this study are important toward a molecular-level description of Ni(II) uptake processes at the water–mineral interface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strawn, D. G., & Sparks, D. L. (1999) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1006/jcis.1999.6330 · Cited by 283
Cited by
Adsorption of Dyes Using Different Types of Clay: A Review
Adeyemo, A. A., Adeoye, I. O., & Bello, O. S. (2017) · Applied Water Science · doi:10.1007/s13201-015-0322-y · Cited by 609
Removal of Cu(II) and Fulvic Acid by Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Decorated with Fe3O4 Nanoparticles
Li, J., Zhang, S., Chen, C., Zhao, G., Yang, X., Li, J., & Wang, X. (2012) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am301358b · Cited by 516
Self-citationPreconcentration of U(vi) ions on few-layered graphene oxide nanosheets from aqueous solutions
Zhao, G., Wen, T., Yang, X., Yang, S., Liao, J., Hu, J., Shao, D., & Wang, X. (2012) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/c2dt00054g · Cited by 379
Self-citationZong, P., Wang, S., Zhao, Y., Wang, H., Pan, H., & He, C. (2013) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.038 · Cited by 324
Ali, W., Mao, K., Zhang, H., Junaid, M., Xu, N., Rasool, A., Feng, X., & Yang, Z. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122720 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, S., Sheng, G., Tan, X., Hu, J., Du, J., Montavon, G., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 6520-6534
- ISSN
- 0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994222473
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.