The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: Development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future
Open accessAbstract
Plantation forests are increasing rapidly in the world in order to alleviate deforestation and degradation of natural forests, along with providing various goods and services. While monoculture plantations have been the dominant type of plantation in practice and well-recorded in research, in the face of intensifying climate change and resource scarcity, there is a growing interest in mixed-species plantations. Agroforestry systems are also catching the attention of foresters, smallholders and landowners. However, there are relatively limited number of studies on successful species mixtures. This paper first reviews the progression of monocultures and mixed-species, followed by the comparisons of advantages, disadvantages and effects on the surrounding natural ecosystems between these two types of plantations. The paper further investigates combinations of species with complementary traits for efficient use of limiting resources associated with improvement in growth development and production of tree species, as well as examining some other challenges in mixed-species. In addition, it is helpful to select and combine tree/crop species in mixtures based on complementary traits that maximise positive and minimise negative interactions and using the advance molecular technologies for genetic analysis. With careful design and proper management, mixed-species plantations with two, three or four species can be more productive and have more advantages in biodiversity, economy and forest health over monocultures. Many researchers are still working on different projects to explore the potential benefits and to promote the applications of mixed-species plantations and agroforestry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O., & Kunin, W. E. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 · Cited by 6,458
Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services
Worm, B., Barbier, E. B., Beaumont, N., Duffy, J. E., Folke, C., Halpern, B. S., Jackson, J. B. C., Lotze, H. K., Micheli, F., Palumbi, S. R., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132294 · Cited by 4,544
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020
(2020) · doi:10.4060/ca9825en · Cited by 3,408
Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems.
Tilman, D., Wedin, D., & Knops, J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379718a0 · Cited by 2,803
Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services
Balvanera, P., Pfisterer, A. B., Buchmann, N., He, J., Nakashizuka, T., Raffaelli, D., & Schmid, B. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x · Cited by 2,650
TRY – a global database of plant traits
KATTGE, J., DÍAZ, S., LAVOREL, S., PRENTICE, I. C., LEADLEY, P., BÖNISCH, G., GARNIER, E., WESTOBY, M., REICH, P. B., WRIGHT, I. J., et al. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x · Cited by 2,638
The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems
Altieri, M. A. (1999) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00028-6 · Cited by 2,561
Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., & Knops, J. M. H. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04742 · Cited by 2,311
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020
(2020) · FAO eBooks · doi:10.4060/ca8753en · Cited by 1,896
Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship
Mace, G. M., Norris, K., & Fitter, A. H. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006 · Cited by 1,832
Cited by
Guidance for successful tree planting initiatives
Brancalion, P. H. S., & Holl, K. D. (2020) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13725 · Cited by 346
Homogenization of the terrestrial water cycle
Levia, D. F., Creed, I. F., Hannah, D. M., Nanko, K., Boyer, E. W., Carlyle-Moses, D. E., van de Giesen, N., Grasso, D., Guswa, A. J., Hudson, J. E., et al. (2020) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-020-0641-y · Cited by 325
Meeting the Food Security Challenge for Nine Billion People in 2050: What Impact on Forests?
Bahar, N. H. A., Lo, M., Sanjaya, M., Van Vianen, J., Alexander, P., Ickowitz, A., & Sunderland, T. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102056 · Cited by 259
Restoring Abandoned Farmland to Mitigate Climate Change on a Full Earth
Yang, Y., Hobbie, S. E., Hernandez, R. R., Fargione, J., Grodsky, S. M., Tilman, D., Zhu, Y.-G., Luo, Y., Smith, T. M., Jungers, J. M., et al. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.019 · Cited by 133
“Managing for plant diversity has not been widely practiced in restorations,(29) as reflected in the dominant use of monocultures in global reforestation or afforestation efforts.(30,31) However, decades of ecological experiments have identified biodiversity as a major determinant of ecosystem functioning, including ec…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, C. L. C., Kuchma, O., & Krutovsky, K. V.
- Venue
- Global Ecology and Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- e00419
- ISSN
- 2351-9894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883237842
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 109
- FWCI
- 62.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: Development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00419
- The paper
- Liu, C. L. C., Kuchma, O., & Krutovsky, K. V. (2018). Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: Development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future. Global Ecology and Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.