Cited by 9Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation

Landscape connectivity loss after the de-escalation of armed conflict in the Colombian Amazon (2011-2021)

Open access
López, Jesica, Qian, Yuyang, Murillo-Sandoval, Paulo José, Clerici, Nicola, Eklundh, Lars·2024·Global Ecology and Conservation

Abstract

Rapid deforestation has been well-documented in Colombia after the 2016 peace agreement with FARC. While many analysis using remote sensing identify land cover change, structural connectivity variables are less studied for understanding landscape transformation. In this work, we used data from the Landsat archive from 2011 to 2021, the Continuous Change Detection and Classification algorithm (CCDC), and Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis (MSPA) to analyze deforestation, land cover change, and landscape connectivity in northwestern Colombia’s Amazon. We examined the spatial patterns in three specific subsets in the Colombian arc of deforestation, with a special focus on the surroundings of the National Natural Park Serranía de Chiribiquete. Our results confirm changes in structural connectivity linked to pasture expansion from the conversion forest to pasture during the analyzed period showing changes in the borders of Serranía de Chiribiquete National Park along rivers and roads, where cattle is transported. Before 2016, the average annual deforested area in the three study areas was 27.93 km²; after 2016, this number increased to 73.36 km². The outcomes of our study contribute to an improved understanding of pasture dynamics. They can aid decision-making in areas that play a key role in ecological networks necessary for long-term conservation efforts. Our quantitative assessments have revealed a temporal shrinking of the core area, indicative of a decline in forest cover…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03094

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
López, J., Qian, Y., Murillo-Sandoval, P. J., Clerici, N., & Eklundh, L.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Universidad del Rosario (CO)
Corresponding author
López, Jesica
Venue
Global Ecology and Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
54
Pages
e03094
ISSN
2351-9894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400966367
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Ecology and Conservation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Repositorio Institucional E-DocUR (Universidad Del Rosario) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
The Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Keywords
landscape connectivity, deforestation, land cover change, pasture expansion, forest-to-pasture conversion, FARC peace agreement, Colombian Amazon, structural connectivity, ecological networks, sustainable land use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review