Cited by 68Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesRetinal Development and DisordersVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Prevalence and gene frequency of color vision impairments among children of six populations from North Indian region

Open access
Fareed, Mohd, Anwar, Malik Azeem, Afzal, Mohammad·2015·Genes & Diseases

Abstract

X-linked red-green color blindness is the most widespread form of vision impairment. The study aimed to determine the prevalence and gene frequencies of red-green color vision impairments among children of six different human populations of Jammu province. A total of 1028 healthy subjects (6-15 years of age) were selected from five Muslim populations and the color vision impairments were determined using the Ishihara's test of color deficiency. The gene frequency was calculated using Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium method. The prevalence of color vision deficiency (CVD) ranged from 5.26% to 11.36% among males and 0.00%-3.03% among females of six different populations. The gender based differences in the frequency of CVD was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.0001), with a higher prevalence among male (7.52%) as compared to female (0.83%) children. We observed high frequency of deutan as compared to protan defects. The incidences of deuteranomaly (5.68%) and deuteranopia (2.27%) were higher among male children of Syed population while the frequencies of protanomaly (1.94%), protanopia (1.28%) and achromacy (2.27%) were the highest among male subjects of Khan, Malik and Syed populations, respectively. The allele and genotype frequencies showed cogent differences among six populations. The population based assessment of CVDs help patients to follow adaptive strategies that could minimize the risks of the disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gendis.2015.02.006

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fareed, M., Anwar, M. A., & Afzal, M.
Affiliations
Aligarh Muslim University (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Fareed, Mohd
  • Afzal, Mohammad
Venue
Genes & Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
211-218
ISSN
2352-3042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028358247
Cited by
68
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
color vision deficiency, red-green color blindness, X-linked inheritance, allele frequency, prevalence, deuteranomaly, deuteranopia, protanomaly, protanopia, achromatopsia, sex differences, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, North Indian population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review