Cited by 30Folate and B Vitamins ResearchMetabolism and Genetic DisordersGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Genetic polymorphism of MTHFR C677T and premature coronary artery disease susceptibility: A meta-analysis

Hou, Xiaowen, Chen, Xin, Shi, Jingpu·2015·Gene

Abstract

The association between 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T gene polymorphism and premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) is controversial. To explore a more precise estimation of the association, a meta-analysis was conducted in the present study. The relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, Cochrane Collaboration Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database and China Biological Medicine up to November, 2014. The meta-analysis was performed by STATA 11. 21 studies with a total of 6912 subjects, including 2972 PCAD patients and 3940 controls. The pooled analysis showed that MTHFR C677T gene polymorphism was probably associated with PCAD (CT vs. CC: OR=1.13, 95% CI=1.01-1.27; dominant model: OR=1.16, 95% CI=1.04-1.29; recessive model: OR=1.19, 95% CI=1.00-1.40; allele analysis: OR=1.17, 95% CI=1.01-1.34). Subgroup analysis by plasma homocysteine concentration showed a significant association in the homocysteine >15μmol/L subgroup (CT vs. CC: OR=1.44, 95% CI=1.10-1.88; TT vs. CC: OR=2.51, 95% CI=1.12-5.63; dominant model: OR=1.51, 95% CI=1.16-1.96; recessive model: OR=2.33, 95% CI=1.05-5.20; allele analysis: OR=1.48, 95% CI=1.18-1.87). Subgroup analysis by continent displayed a significant association among the Asian population (CT vs. CC: OR=1.51, 95% CI=1.23-1.86; TT vs. CC: OR=2.81, 95% CI=1.87-4.23; dominant model: OR=1.65, 95% CI=1.35-2.01; recessive model: OR=2.22, 95% CI=1.53-3.21; allele analysis: OR=1.61, 95% CI=1.37-1.89). The statistical stability and reliability was demonstrated by sensitivity analysis and publication bias outcomes. In conclusion, the meta-analysis suggests that MTHFR C677T gene polymorphism may be associated with PCAD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gene.2015.03.062

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hou, X., Chen, X., & Shi, J.
Affiliations
First Hospital of China Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Shi, Jingpu
Venue
Gene
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
565
Issue
1
Pages
39-44
ISSN
0378-1119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045985634
Cited by
30
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
MTHFR C677T polymorphism, premature coronary artery disease, genetic susceptibility, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, plasma homocysteine, Asian populations, genetic association, coronary risk factors, genetic polymorphism
MeSH terms
Adult, China, Coronary Artery Disease, Homocysteine, Humans, Middle Aged, Publication Bias, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2), Asian People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review