Cited by 63Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsRestraint-Related DeathsElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Factors associated with the use of physical restraints for agitated patients in psychiatric emergency rooms

Migon, Marcelo N., Coutinho, Evandro S., Huf, Giselle, Adams, Clive E., Cunha, Geraldo M., Allen, Michael H.·2008·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To examine factors associated with physical restraint in psychiatric emergency rooms.Method We extracted variables likely to predict use of physical restraints from a large randomised trial undertaken in three psychiatric emergency rooms in Rio de Janeiro. We fitted a Bayesian binary multivariate model using only variables clearly preceding the restraints.Results Of 301 agitated, aggressive people admitted to emergency rooms, 73 (24%) were restrained during the first 2 h of admission. In Rio, younger people (OR=1.03 for each year younger), exhibiting intense (OR=2.53) or extreme agitation (OR=7.71), thought to result from substance misuse (OR=1.75) or diagnoses other than psychosis (OR=1.88), arriving in the morning (OR=1.64) were at greater risk of physical restraints than older, less severely aggressive or agitated people, arriving at the hospital during the afternoon or night. Hospital, gender, first admission to hospital and medication were not associated with risk of being restrained.Conclusion Restraint practices in Rio are predictable and based on a limited clinical assessment. Predictive factors for physical restraint may vary worldwide, but should be monitored and studied to assist training, and to establish programs to evaluate and refine this controversial practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.12.005

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physical restraints could promote the occurrence of agitation, as described in psychiatric emergency departments.

    “Physical restraints could promote, however, the occurrence of agitation, as described in psychiatric emergency departments [30].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Migon, M. N., Coutinho, E. S., Huf, G., Adams, C. E., Cunha, G. M., & Allen, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca (BR)
  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (BR)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Allen, Michael H.
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
263-268
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978978302
Cited by
63
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
physical restraint, agitated patients, psychiatric emergency department, risk factors, aggression, substance abuse, psychosis, age, time of admission
MeSH terms
Adult, Aggression, Bayes Theorem, Brazil, Drug Therapy, Combination, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Female, Haloperidol, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Midazolam, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Promethazine, Psychomotor Agitation, Psychotic Disorders, Restraint, Physical, Risk Factors, Tranquilizing Agents, Utilization Review, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review