Cited by 33Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Monitoring somatic symptoms in patients with mental disorders: sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the somatic symptom scale – 8 (SSS-8)

Gierk, Benjamin, Kohlmann, Sebastian, Hagemann-Goebel, Marion, Löwe, Bernd, Nestoriuc, Yvonne·2017·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The SSS-8 is a brief questionnaire for the assessment of somatic symptom burden. This study examines its sensitivity to change and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patients with mental disorders.Method 55 outpatients with mental disorders completed the SSS-8 and measures of anxiety, depression, and disability before and after receiving treatment. Effect sizes and correlations between the change scores were calculated. The MCID was estimated using a one standard error of measurement threshold and the change in disability as an external criterion.Results There was a medium decline in somatic symptom burden for the complete sample (n=55, d z=0.53) and a large decline in a subgroup with very high somatic symptom burden at baseline (n=11, d z=0.94). Decreases in somatic symptom burden were associated with decreases in anxiety (r=0.68, p<0.001), depression (r=0.62, p<0.001) and disability (r=0.51, p<0.001). The MCID was estimated as a 3-point decrease.Conclusion The SSS-8 is sensitive to change. A 3-point decrease reflects a clinically important improvement. Due to its brevity and sound psychometric properties, the SSS-8 is useful for monitoring somatic symptom burden.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.07.002

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gierk, B., Kohlmann, S., Hagemann-Goebel, M., Löwe, B., & Nestoriuc, Y.
Affiliations
  • Asklepios (DE)
  • Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbek (DE)
Corresponding author
Gierk, Benjamin
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
48
Pages
51-55
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2736834985
Cited by
33
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 16 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
somatic symptom burden, sensitivity to change, minimal clinically important difference, mental illness, anxiety, depression, functional disability, psychometric properties, treatment outcome monitoring
MeSH terms
Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review