Cited by 40Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil erosion and sediment transport

Soil organic C and N stock changes in grass-clover leys: Effect of grassland proportion and organic fertilizer

Open access
Jensen, Johannes L., Beucher, Amélie M., Eriksen, Jørgen·2022·Geoderma

Abstract

Grass-clover leys in crop rotations on dairy farms may contribute to mitigation of climate change through soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. However, accurately quantifying SOC sequestration potential of grass-clover leys is a challenge as long-term experiments with regular soil sampling and crop rotations with varying grassland proportion are extremely rare. Based on a long-term organic dairy crop rotation experiment at Foulumgaard Experimental Station (Denmark) initiated in 1987 with contrasting crop rotations (2 or 4 years of grass-clover in a six-course rotation) and cattle slurry input from 2006 to 2018, we examined the effect of grassland proportion (31 to 69% grass-clover) and slurry C-input (0 to 1.45 Mg C ha−1 yr−1) on SOC storage in the top soil layer (0–20 cm). At steady-state conditions, the SOC stock based on equivalent soil mass (SOC stockFM) increased by 5.0 Mg C ha−1 when converting soil with a prehistory of cereal dominated cropping to a crop rotation with 1/3 grass-clover. The steady-state condition was established after 20 years, and the rate of change was largest in the initial years. A multiple regression model including grassland proportion, slurry C-input and the initial SOC stockFM explained 47% of the variation in the SOC stock from 2005 to 2018. The SOC stockFM increased 4.2 Mg C ha−1 when increasing the grassland proportion from 1/3 to 2/3 during the 13 years (0.32 Mg C ha−1 yr−1). Of the applied slurry-C, 11% was retained in soil, which means that an annual increase in cattle slurry input of 1.5 Mg C ha−1 (150 kg total-N ha−1) will increase SOC stockFM by 2.2 Mg C ha−1 (0.17 Mg C ha−1 yr−1) during the 13 years. Further, our study showed that soil nitrogen is stored along with SOC in equal proportions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, J. L., Beucher, A. M., & Eriksen, J.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Johannes L.
Venue
Geoderma
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
424
Pages
116022
ISSN
0016-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283692921
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geoderma (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Miljø- og Fødevareministeriet (33010-NIFA-19-708)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil organic carbon, soil organic nitrogen, grass-clover ley, cattle slurry, organic fertilizer, carbon sequestration, soil carbon stocks, nitrogen retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review