The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Political ecology and the epistemology of social justice
Open accessAbstract
Piers Blaikie’s writings on political ecology in the 1980s represented a turning point in the generation of environmental knowledge for social justice. His writings since the 1980s demonstrated a further transition in the identification of social justice by replacing a Marxist and eco-catastrophist epistemology with approaches influenced by critical realism, post-structuralism and participatory development. Together, these works demonstrated an important engagement with the politics of how environmental explanations are made, and the mutual dependency of social values and environmental knowledge. Yet, today, the lessons of Blaikie’s work are often missed by analysts who ask what is essentially political or ecological about political ecology, or by those who argue that a critical approach to environmental knowledge should mean deconstruction alone. This paper reviews Blaikie’s work since the 1980s and focuses especially on the meaning of ‘politics’ within his approach to political ecology. The paper argues that Blaikie’s key contribution is not just in linking environmental knowledge and politics, but also in showing ways that environmental analysis and policy can be reframed towards addressing the problems of socially vulnerable people. This pragmatic co-production of environmental knowledge and social values offers a more constructive means of building socially just environmental policy than insisting politics or ecology exist independently of each other, or believing environmental interventions are futile in a post-Latourian world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4888 · Cited by 9,294
At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P. M., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. J. (1994) · Cited by 6,286
The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process
Hajer, M. A. (1997) · doi:10.1093/019829333x.001.0001 · Cited by 4,184
Bhaskar, R. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203090732 · Cited by 4,012
States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order
Jasanoff, S. (2004) · Cited by 2,942
(2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315685366 · Cited by 2,046
Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects
Agrawal, A. (2005) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 1,206
Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements
Porter, P. W., Peet, R., & Watts, M. (1997) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/215244 · Cited by 1,201
Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-2422 · Cited by 1,096
The Political Economy of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries
Blaikie, P. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315637556 · Cited by 946
Cited by
Agroecology and Politics. How To Get Sustainability? About the Necessity for a Political Agroecology
de Molina, M. G. (2013) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/10440046.2012.705810 · Cited by 164
Lively water infrastructure: Constructed wetlands in more-than-human waterscapes
Hurst, E., Ellis, R., & Karippal, A. B. (2025) · Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486221113712 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Forsyth, T.
- Venue
- Geoforum
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 756-764
- ISSN
- 0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057021832
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 33.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political ecology and the epistemology of social justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.005
- The paper
- Forsyth, T. (2008). Political ecology and the epistemology of social justice. Geoforum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.