Cited by 164Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentSocial Sciences and HumanitiesRural Development and Agriculture

Agroecology and Politics. How To Get Sustainability? About the Necessity for a Political Agroecology

de Molina, Manuel Gonzalez·2013·Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems

Abstract

Agroecological movements are spreading and many local experiences are being carried out. But agroecology still has not developed instruments and approaches to elaborate state and regional strategies, where the political and institutional aspects play a key role. This text contributes to overcoming these oversights by means of a theoretical foundation that demonstrates why agroecology should engage politics. First, we argue that agroecosystems, as socioecological constructions, are produced through power relations. Second, we show the close relationship between agroecosystem dynamics and politics, and, therefore, the crucial role that political agroecology plays in the agroecological transition. Finally, we evaluate the world food system as the context in which agroecological experiences should be developed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10440046.2012.705810

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effective and horizontal involvement of social organizations in co-production of public policy and in creating a holistic vision of agricultural and food systems may prevent and compensate risks of conventionalization or cooptation through participatory processes.

    “The effective and horizontal involvement of social organizations in the co-production of public policy, as well as in creating a holistic vision of agricultural and food systems, may serve to prevent and compensate these risks through participatory processes”
  • The dialectical articulation between local administrations, academia and social organizations is a central element in scaling agroecological transitions.

    “The dialectical articulation between local administrations, academia and social organizations is another central element in scaling agroecological transitions”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Molina, M. G.
Affiliations
University Pablo de Olavide
Venue
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2012-12-17
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
45-59
ISSN
  • 2168-3565 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-3573
OpenAlex
W2199902276
Cited by
164
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
18.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
Keywords
agroecological transition, agroecological movement, power relations, social-ecological systems, food system sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review