Rubber tapper identities: Political-economic dynamics, livelihood shifts, and environmental implications in a changing Amazon
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the SPs of Southeastern Pará, a multiplicity of factors potentially affect the switch from subsistence agriculture to cattle ranching, including the availability of credit and strong economic returns stemming from the global demand for beef.
“In the SPs of Southeastern Pará, a multiplicity of factors potentially affect the switch from subsistence agriculture to cattle ranching, including the availability of credit and strong economic returns stemming from the global demand for beef [2,12,17].”
From Smallholders, Agrarian Reform, and Globalization in the Brazilian Amazon: Cattle versus the Environment (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
Even traditional groups that originally engaged in extractive activities, such as the rubber tappers in the Chico Mendes reserve, have instead opted for cattle ranching.
“Even traditional groups that originally engaged in extractive activities, such as the rubber tappers in the Chico Mendes reserve, have instead opted for cattle ranching [17].”
From Smallholders, Agrarian Reform, and Globalization in the Brazilian Amazon: Cattle versus the Environment (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pereira, R., Simmons, C., & Walker, R. (2016) · Land · doi:10.3390/land5030024 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gomes, C. V. A., Vadjunec, J. M., & Perz, S. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Oklahoma State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Perz, Stephen G.
- Venue
- Geoforum
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 260-271
- ISSN
- 0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088463482
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geoforum (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
- Keywords
- rubber tappers, extractive reserves, Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve, cattle ranching, self-identification, socio-economic determinants, household assets, institutional environment, forest conservation, regional development, Amazon, environmental change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
