Cited by 38Extractivism and Socioeconomic IssuesGlobal Energy Security and PolicyNatural Resources and Economic Development

Disposable Ordos: The making of an energy resource frontier in western China

Woodworth, Max D.·2017·Geoforum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.04.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Woodworth, M. D.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Woodworth, Max D.
Venue
Geoforum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
78
Pages
133-140
ISSN
0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2383624291
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geoforum (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chiang Chiang-kuo Foundation
  • Association for Asian Studies China Inner-Asia Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › General Energy › Global Energy Security and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
Keywords
coal production, Ordos, Inner Mongolia, energy policy, capital flows, political economy, China's western region

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review