Cited by 16Digital Economy and Work TransformationLegal and Labor StudiesDigital Games and Media

Playing for keeps: digital labor and blockchain precarity in play-to-earn gaming

Kuo Siong Tan, Gordon·2024·Geoforum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104009

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Axie Infinity demonstrates how blockchain-based gaming produces new forms of labor precarity, endangering employment levels through exploitative practices.

    “Axie Infinity can demonstrates how blockchain-based gaming produces new forms of labor precarity, endangering employment levels through exploitative practices (Kuo Siong Tan, 2024).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuo Siong Tan, G.
Venue
Geoforum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
151
Pages
104009
ISSN
0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394840229
Cited by
16
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 1
FWCI
11.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geoforum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
digital labor, labor-capital relations, Axie Infinity, cryptocurrency market, platform governance, precarious employment, COVID-19 pandemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review