The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing landslide inventory maps
Abstract
Landslide inventory maps are effective and easily understandable products for both experts, such as geomorphologists, and for non experts, including decision-makers, planners, and civil defense managers. Landslide inventories are essential to understand the evolution of landscapes, and to ascertain landslide susceptibility and hazard. Despite landslide maps being compiled every year in the word at different scales, limited efforts are made to critically compare landslide maps prepared using different techniques or by different investigators. Based on the experience gained in 20 years of landslide mapping in Italy, and on the limited literature on landslide inventory assessment, we propose a general framework for the quantitative comparison of landslide inventory maps. To test the proposed framework we exploit three inventory maps. The first map is a reconnaissance landslide inventory prepared for the Umbria region, in central Italy. The second map is a detailed geomorphological landslide map, also prepared for the Umbria region. The third map is a multi-temporal landslide inventory compiled for the Collazzone area, in central Umbria. Results of the experiment allow for establishing how well the individual inventories describe the location, type and abundance of landslides, to what extent the landslide maps can be used to determine the frequency-area statistics of the slope failures, and the significance of the inventory maps as predictors of landslide susceptibility. We further use the results obtained in the Collazzone area to estimate the quality and completeness of the two regional landslide inventory maps, and to outline general advantages and limitations of the techniques used to complete the inventories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification
Fulkerson, B. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1995.10484383 · Cited by 2,209
Cruden, D. M. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,906
Landslides : investigation and mitigation
Turner, A. K., & Schuster, R. L. (1996) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 1,501
Landslide inventories and their statistical properties
Malamud, B. D., Turcotte, D. L., Guzzetti, F., & Reichenbach, P. (2004) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1064 · Cited by 1,307
Self-citationEstimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models
Guzzetti, F., Reichenbach, P., Ardizzone, F., Cardinali, M., & Galli, M. (2006) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.007 · Cited by 935
Self-citationGis Technology in Mapping Landslide Hazard
Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F., & Reichenbach, P. (1995) · Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8404-3_8 · Cited by 574
Self-citationPower-law correlations of landslide areas in central Italy
Guzzetti, F., Malamud, B. D., Turcotte, D. L., & Reichenbach, P. (2002) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(01)00589-1 · Cited by 472
Self-citationSupply and Removal of Sediment in a Landslide‐Dominated Mountain Belt: Central Range, Taiwan
Hovius, N., Stark, C. P., Hao‐Tsu, C., & Jiun‐Chuan, L. (2000) · The Journal of Geology · doi:10.1086/314387 · Cited by 439
Liu, H. (1996) · ACM SIGART Bulletin · doi:10.1145/230062.1066049 · Cited by 369
Lee, E. M., & Jones, D. K. C. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203749524 · Cited by 366
Cited by
State of science: mental workload in ergonomics
Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2015) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.956151 · Cited by 948
Metadata
- Authors
- Galli, M., Ardizzone, F., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F., & Reichenbach, P.
- Venue
- Geomorphology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 268-289
- ISSN
- 0169-555X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095057310
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 32.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing landslide inventory maps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.09.023
- The paper
- Galli, M., Ardizzone, F., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F., & Reichenbach, P. (2008). Comparing landslide inventory maps. Geomorphology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.09.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.