Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 480

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A random forest model of landslide susceptibility mapping based on hyperparameter optimization using Bayes algorithm

Sun, Deliang, Wen, Haijia, Wang, Danzhou, Xu, Jiahui·2020·Geomorphology

Abstract

Abstract The choice of model parameters in landslide susceptibility mapping makes a major determinant of model accuracy. The purpose of this study is to optimize the hyperparameters based on a Bayesian optimization algorithm, and to obtain a high accuracy random forest landslide susceptibility evaluation model. The research steps are detailed as follows. Firstly, taking a typical landslide prone mountainous area as an example, 16 conditioning factors, such as elevation, annual average rainfall, distance from roads, distance from buildings and so on, were preliminarily selected as the conditioning factors of landslide susceptibility. Combined with 1520 historical landslide events, a geospatial database was established with 30 m resolution. Secondly, the geospatial data sample set was constructed by random sampling according to ratio of historical landslides and non-landslides of 1:10. Based on the whole sample set, the random forest model adopted the Bayesian optimization algorithm to optimize the hyperparameters. Next, the optimal hyperparameters were selected to be trained to get the evaluation model of landslide susceptibility. In addition, they were carried out the analysis of landslide susceptibility mapping for the whole study area. After that, the recursive feature elimination method was used to screen out the dominant conditioning factors that can explain the degree of landslide susceptibility. The results indicated that the area under curve (AUC) values of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in training data set, verification data set and regional simulation were 0.95, 0.87 and 0.93, respectively. 65% of the historical landslides fell between the high susceptibility and very high susceptibility regions, which made up

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107201

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 480

Metadata

Authors
Sun, D., Wen, H., Wang, D., & Xu, J.
Venue
Geomorphology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
362
Pages
107201
ISSN
0169-555X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015779580
Cited by
480
References
2
FWCI
71.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A random forest model of landslide susceptibility mapping based on hyperparameter optimization using Bayes algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107201
The paper
Sun, D., Wen, H., Wang, D., & Xu, J. (2020). A random forest model of landslide susceptibility mapping based on hyperparameter optimization using Bayes algorithm. Geomorphology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.