The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044
Users' guides to the medical literature
Guyatt, G. H. (1993) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.270.17.2096 · Cited by 2,970
Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Altman, D. G. (2000) · Cited by 2,312
Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.
Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2002) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/31.3.697 · Cited by 1,363
Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study
Loperfido, S., Angelini, G., Benedetti, G., Chilovi, F., Costan, F., De Berardinis, F., De Bernardin, M., Ederle, A., Fina, P., & Fratton, A. (1998) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70121-x · Cited by 1,190
Jaeschke, R. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510290071040 · Cited by 1,049
Complications of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
Bilbao, M. K., Dotter, C. T., Lee, T. G., & Katon, R. M. (1976) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(76)80139-4 · Cited by 657
Some Statistical Methods for Combining Experimental Results
Laird, N. M., & Mosteller, F. (1990) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462300008916 · Cited by 568
Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Gollan, J. L. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500080066034 · Cited by 525
Cited by
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Song, F., Parekh, Hooper, L., Loke, Y., Ryder, J., Sutton, A., Hing, C., Kwok, C., Pang, C., & Harvey, I. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14080 · Cited by 1,039
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones
(2016) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.03.005 · Cited by 576
Metadata
- Authors
- Verma, D., Kapadia, A., Eisen, G. M., & Adler, D. G.
- Venue
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 248-254
- ISSN
- 0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999906988
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 10.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gie.2005.12.038
- The paper
- Verma, D., Kapadia, A., Eisen, G. M., & Adler, D. G. (2006). EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.12.038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
