Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meshed capillary vessels by use of narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps

Open access
Sano, Yasushi, Ikematsu, Hiroaki, Fu, Kuang I., Emura, Fabian, Katagiri, Atsushi, Horimatsu, Takahiro, Kaneko, Kazuhiro, Soetikno, Roy, Yoshida, Shigeaki·2009·Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although microvascular vessels on the surface of colorectal polyps are observed by narrow-band imaging (NBI) with magnification, its clinical usefulness is still uncertain. OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to evaluate the usefulness of meshed capillary (MC) vessels observed by NBI magnification for differentiating between nonneoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions. DESIGN Prospective polyp study. SETTING National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan. PATIENTS A total of 702 consecutive patients who underwent total colonoscopy between September and December 2004 were prospectively evaluated. Patients with polyps >10 mm and those with polyps previously evaluated by histologic examination or colonoscopy were excluded. INTERVENTION Lesions were classified into 2 groups: polyps with invisible or faintly visible MC vessels as nonneoplastic and polyps with clearly visible MC vessels as neoplastic. Lesions judged as nonneoplastic were subjected to biopsy and those as neoplastic were removed endoscopically. Histologic analysis was performed in all lesions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT Visible or invisible surface MC vessels, prediction of histologic diagnosis. RESULTS Of 92 eligible patients enrolled in this study, 150 lesions, including 39 (26%) hyperplastic polyps and 111 (74%) adenomatous polyps, were detected. Observation of MC vessels detected 107 of 111 neoplastic polyps and 36 of 39 nonneoplastic polyps. The overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 95.3%, 96.4%, and 92.3%, respectively. LIMITATIONS MC vessel judgment performed by a single colonoscopist with extensive experience in magnifying NBI. CONCLUSION Observation of surface MC vessels by magnifying NBI is a useful and simple method for differentiating colorectal nonneoplastic and neoplastic polyps.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.066

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Sano, Y., Ikematsu, H., Fu, K. I., Emura, F., Katagiri, A., Horimatsu, T., Kaneko, K., Soetikno, R., & Yoshida, S.
Venue
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
278-283
ISSN
0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981013931
Cited by
290
References
26
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meshed capillary vessels by use of narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.066
The paper
Sano, Y., Ikematsu, H., Fu, K. I., Emura, F., Katagiri, A., Horimatsu, T., Kaneko, K., Soetikno, R., & Yoshida, S. (2009). Meshed capillary vessels by use of narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.066

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.