The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Colorectal tumours and pit pattern.
Open accessAbstract
AIMS--To investigate the morphological and histopathological associations between an individual pit seen on stereomicroscopy or magnifying colonoscopy and an individual crypt seen in histological sections; and to examine these associations in colorectal tumours. METHODS--Fourteen thousand and twenty three cases were examined by colonoscope at Akita Red Cross Hospital. The surface mucosal pits of the lesions were observed using a magnifying endoscope in vivo and the pits of the extracted specimens were observed in vitro using a stereo microscope. Histological diagnoses were determined by light microscopy: the pit patterns in 100 glands were analysed. RESULTS--Pit pattern was classified into seven principal types: (1) normal round pit; (2) small round pit; (3) small asteroid pit; (4) large asteroid pit; (5) oval pit; (6) gyrus-like pit; and (7) non-pit. There was a correlation between pit pattern and the structure of the underlying crypt or gland. Furthermore, there was an association between pit pattern and the histology of the cells in the gland. Macroscopically, types 3, 4, 5, and 6 were common in protruding lesions. Type 2 was common in depressed lesions. The non-pit pattern was recognised in both. The depressed lesions had invaded the deeper layers more rapidly than protruding lesions. CONCLUSIONS--There were associations between individual pits and crypts. The branching carcinoma gland is thought to be the result of malignant transformation of the adenoma gland. The straight carcinoma gland is thought to result from the normal gland becoming malignant. The gland of the small round pit is thought to change from normal to the straight carcinoma gland via malignant transformation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging
Gono, K., Obi, T., Yamaguchi, M., Ohyama, N., Machida, H., Sano, Y., Yoshida, S., Hamamoto, Y., & Endo, T. (2004) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/1.1695563 · Cited by 933
Neufert, C., Becker, C., & Neurath, M. F. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.279 · Cited by 675
Rex, D. K., & Helbig, C. C. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.029 · Cited by 386
High resolution colonoscopy in live mice
Becker, C., Fantini, M. C., & Neurath, M. F. (2006) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.446 · Cited by 369
Chiu, H.-M., Chang, C.-Y., Chen, C.-C., Lee, Y.-C., Wu, M.-S., Lin, J.-T., Shun, C.-T., & Wang, H.-P. (2007) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2006.099614 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Kudo, S., Hirota, S., Nakajima, T., Hosobe, S., Kusaka, H., Kobayashi, T., Himori, M., & Yagyuu, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 880-885
- ISSN
- 0021-9746 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-4146
- OpenAlex
- W2086327306
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jcp.47.10.880
- The paper
- Kudo, S., Hirota, S., Nakajima, T., Hosobe, S., Kusaka, H., Kobayashi, T., Himori, M., & Yagyuu, A. (1994). Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.47.10.880
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.