Cited by 62Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Endoscopic visible light spectroscopy: a new, minimally invasive technique to diagnose chronic GI ischemia

Van Noord, Désirée, Sana, Aria, Benaron, David A., Pattynama, Peter M.T., Verhagen, Hence J.M., Hansen, Bettina E., Kuipers, Ernst J., Mensink, Peter B.F.·2011·Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract

Background The diagnosis of chronic GI ischemia (CGI) remains a clinical challenge. Currently, there is no single simple test with high sensitivity available. Visible light spectroscopy (VLS) is a new technique that noninvasively measures mucosal oxygen saturation during endoscopy. Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of VLS for the detection of ischemia in a large cohort of patients. Design Prospective study, with adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Setting Tertiary referral center. Patients Consecutive patients referred for evaluation of possible CGI. Interventions Patients underwent VLS along with the standard workup consisting of evaluation of symptoms, GI tonometry, and abdominal CT or magnetic resonance angiography. Main outcome measurements VLS measurements and the diagnosis of CGI as established with the standard workup. Results In 16 months, 121 patients were included: 80 in a training data set and 41 patients in a validation data set. CGI was diagnosed in 89 patients (74%). VLS cutoff values were determined based on the diagnosis of CGI and applied in the validation data set, and the results were compared with the criterion standard, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of VLS of 90% and 60%, respectively. Repeated VLS measurements showed improvement in 80% of CGI patients after successful treatment. Limitations Single-center study; only 43% of patients had repeated VLS measurements after treatment. Conclusions VLS during upper endoscopy is a promising easy-to-perform and minimally invasive technique to detect mucosal hypoxemia in patients clinically suspected of having CGI, showing excellent correlation with the established ischemia workup.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.025

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Noord, D., Sana, A., Benaron, D. A., Pattynama, P. M. T., Verhagen, H. J. M., Hansen, B. E., Kuipers, E. J., & Mensink, P. B. F.
Venue
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
291-298
ISSN
0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024439637
Cited by
62
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
visible spectroscopy, diagnostic accuracy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, minimally invasive diagnosis, treatment response monitoring
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Ischemia, Light, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spectrum Analysis, Gastrointestinal Tract, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review