Cited by 23Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentVascular anomalies and interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Combination of Clinical Symptoms and CT or MR Angiography in Patients With Chronic Gastrointestinal Ischemia

Harki, Jihan, Vergouwe, Yvonne, Spoor, Johannes A., Mensink, Peter B., Bruno, Marco J., van Noord, Désirée, Kuipers, Ernst J., Tjwa, Eric T.T.L.·2017·Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background: No golden diagnostic standard is available to diagnose chronic gastrointestinal ischemia (CGI). Goals: We aimed to establish an accurate prediction model for CGI, based on clinical symptoms and radiologic evaluation of the amount of stenosis in the celiac artery (CA) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) by means of computed tomography-angiography or magnetic resonance (MR)-angiography. Study: We prospectively included 436 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of CGI in a tertiary referral center. Predictors for CGI were obtained by comparing clinical parameters to the diagnosis of CGI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to combine the strongest predictors in a model. A score chart based on the prediction model was provided to calculate the risk of CGI. Results: CGI was present in 171/436 (39%) patients (67 y; range, 54 to 74 y; 27% male). Strongest predictors for CGI were female gender [odds ratio (OR)=1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.85-2.43], weight loss (OR=1.63, 95% CI, 0.98-2.72), concomitant cardiovascular disease (OR=1.70, 95% CI, 1.04-2.78), duration of symptoms (OR=0.88, 95% CI, 0.79-0.99), and stenosis of CA and SMA (50% to 70% stenosis CA: OR=1.33, 95% CI, 0.56-3.19; >70% stenosis CA: OR=5.79, 95% CI, 3.42-9.81; 50% to 70% stenosis SMA: OR=3.21, 95% CI, 0.81-12.74; >70% stenosis SMA: OR=4.39, 95% CI, 2.30-8.41). A model based on clinical symptoms alone showed limited discriminative ability for diagnosing CGI (c-statistic 0.62). Adding radiologic imaging of the mesenteric arteries improved the discriminative ability (c-statistic 0.79). Conclusions: Clinical symptoms alone are insufficient to predict the risk of CGI. Radiologic evaluation of the mesenteric arteries is essential. This tool may be useful for clinicians to assess the risk of CGI and to decide whether further diagnostic work-up for CGI is needed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mcg.0000000000000605

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harki, J., Vergouwe, Y., Spoor, J. A., Mensink, P. B., Bruno, M. J., van Noord, D., Kuipers, E. J., & Tjwa, E. T. T. L.
Affiliations
  • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Public Health
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Harki, Jihan
  • Spoor, Johannes A.
  • Mensink, Peter B.
  • Bruno, Marco J.
  • Kuipers, Ernst J.
  • Tjwa, Eric T.T.L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Published
2017-07
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
e39-e47
ISSN
0192-0790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2490403132
Cited by
23
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
Keywords
mesenteric ischemia, celiac artery stenosis, superior mesenteric artery stenosis, CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, diagnostic accuracy, prediction model, clinical risk score, weight loss, cardiovascular disease, diagnostic criteria, female sex as risk factor, symptom duration
MeSH terms
Computed Tomography Angiography, Aged, Celiac Artery, Chronic Disease, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Mesenteric Artery, Superior, Magnetic Resonance Angiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review