Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies

Abu Dayyeh, Barham K., Kumar, Nitin, Edmundowicz, Steven A., Jonnalagadda, Sreenivasa, Larsen, Michael, Sullivan, Shelby, Thompson, Christopher C., Banerjee, Subhas·2015·Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1964

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 92 references

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Abu Dayyeh, B. K., Kumar, N., Edmundowicz, S. A., Jonnalagadda, S., Larsen, M., Sullivan, S., Thompson, C. C., & Banerjee, S.
Venue
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
82
Issue
3
Pages
425-438.e5
ISSN
0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2213014172
Cited by
469
References
92
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1964
The paper
Abu Dayyeh, B. K., Kumar, N., Edmundowicz, S. A., Jonnalagadda, S., Larsen, M., Sullivan, S., Thompson, C. C., & Banerjee, S. (2015). ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1964

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.