The DOI matches its Crossref record.
E-government around the world: lessons, challenges, and future directions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · Cited by 2,451
Self-citationImproving digital skills for the use of online public information and services
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2009) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.002 · Cited by 288
Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore
Tung, L. L., & Rieck, O. (2005) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.06.001 · Cited by 278
The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services
Ashaye, O. R., & Irani, Z. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.016 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 389-394
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042069313
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 45.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.