Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The introduction of traditional digital government initiatives has already been documented as helping reduce public servant corruption.
“The introduction of traditional digital government initiatives has already been documented as helping reduce public servant corruption (Bertot, Jaeger, & Grimes, 2010):”
From Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy (2021) · cites this paper as Bertot, Jaeger, & Grimes, 2010
Cites
Access Denied The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering
Deibert, R., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R., & Zittrain, J. L. (2008) · CrimRxiv · doi:10.21428/cb6ab371.9034e9f7 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611 · see citing works
Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 · Cited by 2,062 · see citing works
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Barberá, P. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.004 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website
Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Big data and AI - A transformational shift for government: So, what next for research?
Pencheva, I., Esteve, M., & Mikhaylov, S. J. (2020) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/0952076718780537 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Wang, C., Teo, T. S. H., & Janssen, M. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102401 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Transparency and Trust in Government. Evidence from a Survey Experiment
Alessandro, M., Cardinale Lagomarsino, B., Scartascini, C., Streb, J., & Torrealday, J. (2021) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105223 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
In AI we trust? Citizen perceptions of AI in government decision making
Ingrams, A., Kaufmann, W., & Jacobs, D. (2022) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.276 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Rogge, N., Agasisti, T., & De Witte, K. (2017) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/0952076716687355 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101497 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Bretschneider, S., Stritch, J. M., Darnall, N., & Hsueh, L. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1874497 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
An Empirical Evaluation Of The Potential Of Public E-Procurement To Reduce Corruption
Neupane, A., Soar, J., & Vaidya, K. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.3127/ajis.v18i2.780 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Osman, I. H., Anouze, A. L., Irani, Z., Lee, H., Medeni, T. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2019) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.018 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Does E-Government Raise Effectiveness and Efficiency?: Examining the Cross-National Effect
Nam, T. (2019) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2019070107 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Pan, L., Fu, X., & Li, Y. (2023) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-022-09539-7 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Examining the Determinants of Police Department Transparency: The View of Police Executives
Chanin, J., & Espinosa, S. (2016) · Criminal Justice Policy Review · doi:10.1177/0887403415596039 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grimes, Justin M.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 264-271
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096870307
- Cited by
- 2,451
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 222 · 2025: 167 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 162 · 2020: 194 · 2019: 190 · 2018: 201 · 2017: 198 · 2016: 173 · 2015: 166 · 2014: 159 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 421.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Government Information Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Administrative Law and Governance
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- e-government, social media, transparency, anti-corruption, information and communication technologies, social change, open government
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
