The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809 · cited 2×
“…have discovered that althoughweak ties between subunits can lead to efficient sharing of knowledge when the shared knowledge is not complex, in multi-unit organizations, strong ties bring the highest positive effect when tacit and complex knowledge is shared (Hansen, 1999; Levin & Cross, 2004).”
BackgroundEnacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective
Boudreau, M.-C., & Robey, D. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0103 · Cited by 1,071
Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0157 · Cited by 802
Analyzing the past to prepare for the future
(2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017160.2017162 · Cited by 179
Information asymmetry and information sharing
Clarkson, G., Jacobsen, T. E., & Batcheller, A. L. (2007) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.001 · Cited by 109
Cited by
E-government and organisational transformation of government: Black box revisited?
Nograšek, J., & Vintar, M. (2014) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.07.006 · Cited by 164
Overcoming the Challenges of Collaboratively Adopting Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector
Campion, A., Gasco-Hernandez, M., Jankin Mikhaylov, S., & Esteve, M. (2022) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439320979953 · Cited by 162
Collaborative data networks for public service: governance, management, and performance
Chen, Y.-C., & Lee, J. (2018) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1305691 · Cited by 76
Designing and implementing data collaboratives: A governance perspective
Ruijer, E. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101612 · Cited by 76
Achieving voluntary data sharing in cross sector partnerships: Three partnership models
Susha, I., Rukanova, B., Zuiderwijk, A., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Gasco Hernandez, M. (2023) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.100448 · Cited by 55
Identifying Useful Approaches to the Governance of Indigenous Data
Bruhn, J. (2014) · International Indigenous Policy Journal · doi:10.18584/iipj.2014.5.2.5 · Cited by 42
Cuganesan, S., Hart, A., & Steele, C. (2017) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1238102 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, T.-M., & Maxwell, T. A.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 164-175
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016749043
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 68.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
