Cited by 55Public Policy and Administration ResearchE-Government and Public ServicesSmart Cities and Technologies

Achieving voluntary data sharing in cross sector partnerships: Three partnership models

Open access
Susha, Iryna, Rukanova, Boriana, Zuiderwijk, Anneke, Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon, Gasco Hernandez, Mila·2023·Information and Organization

Abstract

The complex societal problems that we face today require unprecedented collaboration and evidence-based decisions. These collaboration processes are further propelled by the datafication of virtually all spheres of public life. To benefit from this, the data needs to be made available to allow for data analytics. Thus, data sharing becomes a crucial aspect of cross-sector collaborations that aim to create and capture value from information. Compared to collaborations where data sharing is not the main goal, data sharing partnerships face a number of novel challenges, such as mitigating data risks, complying with data protection legislation, and ensuring responsible data use. Navigating these waters and achieving data sharing can be challenging for both governments and businesses, as well as other actors. How do organizations from different sectors manage to achieve data sharing for addressing societal challenges? To address this research question, we apply a framework of three models of cross sector social partnerships developed in the field of organization studies to structure the analysis of six cases. Our analysis suggests that to a certain extent the partnership model determines the types of drivers and challenges to sharing data in a partnership. Leveraging the drivers and anticipating these challenges can help organizations be more aware of key terms of the collaboration and the mechanisms that can be used to succeed in their partnership goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.100448

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moving beyond one-way information disclosure to genuine co-creation and partnership models is essential for aligning AI systems with societal values and expectations.

    “Moving beyond one-way information disclosure to genuine co-creation and partnership models, as advocated by international bodies, is essential for aligning AI systems with societal values and expectations [53,71].”
  • Collaboration emphasizes the necessity of multi-stakeholder approaches involving industry, policymakers, academia, and civil society to co-create standards, share knowledge, and build consensus.

    “Collaboration emphasizes the necessity of multi-stakeholder approaches involving industry, policymakers, academia, and civil society to co-create standards, share knowledge, and build consensus [53,71].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Susha, I., Rukanova, B., Zuiderwijk, A., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Gasco Hernandez, M.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Susha, Iryna
Venue
Information and Organization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
100448
ISSN
1471-7727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321382152
Cited by
55
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6
FWCI
24.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information and Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsradet
  • Horizon 2020 (786746)
  • National Science Foundation (1649820)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  • European Commission Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development Information and Communication Technol (603993)
  • Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (955569)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
intersectoral collaboration, partnership model, datafication, data protection law, responsible data use, data risk, societal challenges, public-private collaboration, social partnership, data analytics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review