The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison
Open accessAbstract
In developing open data policies, governments aim to stimulate and guide the publication of government data and to gain advantages from its use. Currently there is a multiplicity of open data policies at various levels of government, whereas very little systematic and structured research has been done on the issues that are covered by open data policies, their intent and actual impact. Furthermore, no suitable framework for comparing open data policies is available, as open data is a recent phenomenon and is thus in an early stage of development. In order to help bring about a better understanding of the common and differentiating elements in the policies and to identify the factors affecting the variation in policies, this paper develops a framework for comparing open data policies. The framework includes the factors of environment and context, policy content, performance indicators and public values. Using this framework, seven Dutch governmental policies at different government levels are compared. The comparison shows both similarities and differences among open data policies, providing opportunities to learn from each other’s policies. The findings suggest that current policies are rather inward looking, open data policies can be improved by collaborating with other organizations, focusing on the impact of the policy, stimulating the use of open data and looking at the need to create a culture in which publicizing data is incorporated in daily working processes. The findings could contribute to the development of new open data policies and the improvement of existing open data policies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations
Bhagat, R. S., & Hofstede, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134391 · Cited by 21,664
Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
Perry, J., & Kingdon, J. W. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3323801 · Cited by 11,225
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Kingdon, J. W. (1984) · Cited by 9,299
DiMaggio, P. (1983) · American Sociological Review · Cited by 9,078
Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004) · OUP Catalogue · Cited by 3,535
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · Cited by 2,451
Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 · Cited by 2,062
Self-citationLindblom, C. E. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,054
Cited by
Galliers, R. D., Newell, S., Shanks, G., & Topi, H. (2017) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.08.002 · Cited by 70
Open government data from a legal perspective: An AI-driven systematic literature review
Kempeneer, S., Pirannejad, A., & Wolswinkel, J. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101823 · Cited by 35
Generating Value from Government Data Using AI: An Exploratory Study
Gao, Y., & Janssen, M. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_24 · Cited by 34
Self-citationLuthfi, A., & Janssen, M. (2019) · International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.18517/ijaseit.9.3.8846 · Cited by 22
“When data is decided to be released and given full access to the public, many potential merits can be obtained like opening new knowledge, generating great ideas or other possible value propositions [3], [20].”
BackgroundSelf-citationAI-driven data governance for smart cities: balancing privacy, efficiency, and public trust
Mastrogiovanni, S. (2025) · South Florida Journal of Development · doi:10.46932/sfjdv6n9-029 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-29
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095735272
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 334.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003
- The paper
- Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2014). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.