The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · Cited by 9,479
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054 · Cited by 3,071
Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation.
Sutton, F. X., & Selznick, P. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088633 · Cited by 2,924
Hayward, G. (1984) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/0166-4972(84)90018-x · Cited by 2,771
Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms
Dougherty, D. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.2.179 · Cited by 2,724
Sullivan, L. E. (2009) · The SAGE Glossary of the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.4135/9781412972024.n747 · Cited by 2,442
The Evolution of E‐Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?
Moon, M. J. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00196 · Cited by 1,984
Analysis in qualitative research
Boeije, H. (2010) · Cited by 1,837
Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B. H., & Strange, J. M. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00158-3 · Cited by 1,749
Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present
Hartley, J. F. (2005) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x · Cited by 1,050
Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399711418768 · Cited by 1,043
Internet skills and the digital divide
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810386774 · Cited by 997
The Symbolic Management of Strategic Change: Sensegiving Via Framing and Decoupling
Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.23478255 · Cited by 984
Hartley, J. F., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12136 · Cited by 870
Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept
Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1983) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/975300 · Cited by 709
Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare?
Norris, D. F., & Moon, M. J. (2005) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x · Cited by 648
Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e‐government
Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P. P., & Littleboy, D. (2004) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/09513550410539794 · Cited by 527
Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations
Brown, K. A., & Osborne, S. P. (2010) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203391129 · Cited by 483
The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E‐Governance
Dawes, S. S. (2008) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x · Cited by 478
A Three‐Stage Adoption Process for Social Media Use in Government
Mergel, I. A., & Bretschneider, S. I. (2013) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12021 · Cited by 411
INNOVATION TYPE AND DIFFUSION: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Walker, R. M. (2006) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x · Cited by 384
Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and e-Government
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H. Z., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2007) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 340
Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design
Waldorff, S. B., Kristensen, L. S., & Ebbesen, B. V. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203795958 · Cited by 267
Meijer, A. J. (2011) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02391.x · Cited by 202
Self-citationIntroduction: Collaborative innovation in the public sector
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2012) · Cited by 200
Citizensourcing : Applying the Concept of Open Innovation to the Public Sector
Hilgers, D., & Ihl, J. C. (2010) · RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · Cited by 195
Meijer, A. J. (2013) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.806575 · Cited by 120
Self-citationComputerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (2nd ed.)
Peters, T. A. (1996) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199612)47:12 · Cited by 76
Conceptualizing and Measuring Citizen Co‐Production of Community Safety*
Percy, S. L. (1978) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1978.tb01797.x · Cited by 74
The Transformational Effect of Web 2.0 Technologies on GovernmentPreprint
Mergel, I. A., Schweik, C. M., & Fountain, J. E. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1412796 · Cited by 68
Agents of Change: Strategy and Tactics for Social Innovation
Cels, S., de Jong, J., & Nauta, F. (2012) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 65
E‐Government 2020: Plus ça change, plus c'est la meme chose
Norris, D. F. (2010) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02269.x · Cited by 62
Digital Governance: New Technologies for Improving Public Service and Participation
Milakovich, M. E. (2011) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 55
Collaborative approaches to public sector innovation: A scoping study
Szkuta, K., Pizzicannella, R., & Osimo, D. (2014) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2014.04.002 · Cited by 52
Citizen Participation and Policing: What Do We Know?
Остром, Э. (1978) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/089976407800700110 · Cited by 51
Barriers to Networked Governments: Evidence from Europe 1
Eynon, R., & Dutton, W. H. (2007) · Prometheus · doi:10.1080/08109020701531361 · Cited by 50
Citizens4Citizens: mapping participatory practices on the internet
Meijer, A. J., Burger, N., & Ebbers, W. E. (2009) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 49
Self-citationCultural Barriers to e-government
Margetts, H. Z., & Dunleavy, P. (2002) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 47
Citizens Collaboration and Co-Creation in Public Service Delivery
Kokkinakos, P., Koussouris, S., Panopoulos, D., Askounis, D., Ramfos, A., Georgousopoulos, C., & Wittern, E. (2012) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/jegr.2012070103 · Cited by 40
Citizen Involvement in Coproducing Safety and Security in the Community
Percy, S. L. (1987) · Public Productivity Review · doi:10.2307/3380252 · Cited by 30
Bekkers, V., van Duivenboden, H., & Thaens, M. (2006) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 27
Equity and Accessibility in E-Government
West, D. M. (2005) · Journal of E-Government · doi:10.1300/j399v01n02_03 · Cited by 22
Homburg, V. M. F. (1999) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 21
Organisational solutions for overcoming barriers to eGovernment
Eynon, R., & Margetts, H. Z. (2007) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · Cited by 19
New technologies in public administration
Petroni, G., & Cloete, F. (2005) · Cited by 12
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 2006, Vol. 12
- Schwester, 2009, Examining the barriers to e-government adoption, Electronic Journal of e-Government, 7, 113
- Tapscott, 2008, Transforming government and governance for the twenty-first century, nGenera Insight's Government, 2
- Van der Vijver, 2009, Burgernet in de praktijk. De evaluatie van de pilot van Burgernet, Stichting Maatschappij Veiligheid en Politie (SMVP)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 · Cited by 1,990
A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process
Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2018) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477 · Cited by 401
Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. D. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13070746 · Cited by 309
Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: identifying the elements of e-leadership.
Van Wart, M., Roman, A., Wang, X., & Liu, C. (2019) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852316681446 · Cited by 298
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Meijer, A.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Meijer, Albert
- ORCID
- Meijer, Albert
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 198-206
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043759429
- Semantic Scholar
- c308108b3d727d9e69a5212b6d74e8d23f884e0b
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 104.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Government Information Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Keywords
- digital governance, e-government adoption, barriers to innovation, innovation process, structural barriers, cultural barriers, framing strategies, public value, technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
