Cited by 365E-Government and Public ServicesPublic Policy and Administration ResearchSmart Cities and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies

Open access

Meijer, Albert·2015·Government Information Quarterly

DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Untitled work
(2005) · Cited by 9,479
Framing theory
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054 · Cited by 3,071
Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation.
Sutton, F. X., & Selznick, P. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088633 · Cited by 2,924
Diffusion of innovations
Hayward, G. (1984) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/0166-4972(84)90018-x · Cited by 2,771
Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms
Dougherty, D. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.2.179 · Cited by 2,724
Diffusion of Innovations
Sullivan, L. E. (2009) · The SAGE Glossary of the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.4135/9781412972024.n747 · Cited by 2,442
The Evolution of E‐Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?
Moon, M. J. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00196 · Cited by 1,984
Analysis in qualitative research
Boeije, H. (2010) · Cited by 1,837
Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B. H., & Strange, J. M. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00158-3 · Cited by 1,749
Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present
Hartley, J. F. (2005) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x · Cited by 1,050

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 48 references

3 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

2006, Vol. 12
Schwester, 2009, Examining the barriers to e-government adoption, Electronic Journal of e-Government, 7, 113
Tapscott, 2008, Transforming government and governance for the twenty-first century, nGenera Insight's Government, 2
Van der Vijver, 2009, Burgernet in de praktijk. De evaluatie van de pilot van Burgernet, Stichting Maatschappij Veiligheid en Politie (SMVP)

Sorted by citations

Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 · Cited by 1,990
A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process
Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2018) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477 · Cited by 401
Classification of Barriers to Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: Systematic Literature Review
Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. D. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13070746 · Cited by 309
Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: identifying the elements of e-leadership.
Van Wart, M., Roman, A., Wang, X., & Liu, C. (2019) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852316681446 · Cited by 298
Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356 · Cited by 265
Open data for democracy: Developing a theoretical framework for open data use
Ruijer, E. H. J. M., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. J. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.01.001 · Cited by 240
Self-citation
Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov
Mergel, I. A. (2017) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1320044 · Cited by 206
What followers are saying about transformational leaders fostering employee innovation via organisational learning, knowledge sharing and social media use in public organisations?
Khan, N. A., & Khan, A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.003 · Cited by 217
Overcoming barriers to digital government: mapping the strategies of digital champions
Wilson, C., & Mergel, I. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101681 · Cited by 193
E-Government implementation challenges in small countries: The project manager's perspective
Glyptis, L., Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., Giudice, M. D., Dimitriou, S., & Michael, P. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119880 · Cited by 187
Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment
Ruijer, E. H. J. M., & Meijer, A. J. (2019) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2019.1568884 · Cited by 159
Self-citation
The Diffusion and Adoption of Public Sector Innovations: A Meta-Synthesis of the Literature
de Vries, H., Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2018) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvy001 · Cited by 132
A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation
Mu, R., & Wang, H. (2020) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1838787 · Cited by 168
Electronic government and corruption: Systematic literature review, framework, and agenda for future research
Khan, A., Krishnan, S., & Dhir, A. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120737 · Cited by 209
Organizing public sector AI adoption: Navigating between separation and integration
Selten, F., & Klievink, B. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101885 · Cited by 147
Digital transformation going local: implementation, impacts and constraints from a German perspective
Kuhlmann, S., & Heuberger, M. (2021) · Public Money & Management · doi:10.1080/09540962.2021.1939584 · Cited by 147
Open government data portal usability: A user-centred usability analysis of 41 open government data portals
Nikiforova, A., & McBride, K. (2020) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101539 · Cited by 141
Urban Technological Innovation: Developing and Testing a Sociotechnical Framework for Studying Smart City Projects
Meijer, A. J., & Thaens, M. (2016) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/1078087416670274 · Cited by 138
Self-citation
Digital Divide in Advanced Smart City Innovations
Shin, S., Kim, D., & Chun, S. A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13074076 · Cited by 129
Aligning technology and institutional readiness: the adoption of innovation
Webster, A., & Gardner, J. (2019) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2019.1601694 · Cited by 137
Exploratory Insights on Artificial Intelligence for Government in Europe
van Noordt, C., & Misuraca, G. C. (2020) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439320980449 · Cited by 155
A systematic analysis of digital tools for citizen participation
Shin, B., Floch, J., Rask, M., Baeck, P., Edgar, C., Berditchevskaia, A., Mesure, P., & Branlat, M. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101954 · Cited by 121
Barriers to innovation within large financial services firms
Das, P., Verburg, R. M., Verbraeck, A., & Bonebakker, L. (2017) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-03-2017-0028 · Cited by 113
Citizen-centered big data analysis-driven governance intelligence framework for smart cities
Ju, J., Liu, L., & Feng, Y. (2018) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2018.01.003 · Cited by 113
An attention-based view of AI assimilation in public sector organizations: The case of Saudi Arabia
Alshahrani, A., Dennehy, D., & Mäntymäki, M. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101617 · Cited by 106
Barriers to artificial intelligence adoption in smart cities: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Rjab, A. B., Mellouli, S., & Corbett, J. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101814 · Cited by 120
The diffusion of e-participation in public administrations: A systematic literature review
Steinbach, M., Sieweke, J., & Süß, S. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10919392.2019.1552749 · Cited by 116
Challenges common service centers (CSCs) face in delivering e-government services in rural India
Sharma, S. K., Metri, B. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101573 · Cited by 121
Connecting societal issues, users and data. Scenario-based design of open data platforms
Ruijer, E. H. J. M., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Hogan, M., Enzerink, S., Ojo, A., & Meijer, A. J. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.06.003 · Cited by 98
Self-citation
Closing the Gap or Widening the Divide: The Impacts of Technology‐Enabled Coproduction on Equity in Public Service Delivery
Xu, C. K., & Tang, T. (2020) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13222 · Cited by 105
Efficiency creep and shadow innovation: enacting ambidextrous IT Governance in the public sector
Magnusson, J., Koutsikouri, D., & Päivärinta, T. (2020) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2020.1740617 · Cited by 96
An international exploration of barriers and tactics in the public sector innovation process
Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1668470 · Cited by 99
Joining forces for public value creation? Exploring collaborative innovation in smart city initiatives
Neumann, O., Matt, C., Hitz-Gamper, B. S., Schmidthuber, L., & Stuermer, M. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101411 · Cited by 91
Application of blockchain in dealing with sustainability issues and challenges of financial sector
Mishra, L., & Kaushik, V. (2021) · Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment · doi:10.1080/20430795.2021.1940805 · Cited by 101
Barriers and Drivers of Digital Transformation in Public Organizations: Results from a Survey in the Netherlands
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_4 · Cited by 86
Digital governance: government strategies that impact public services
Idzi, F. M., & Gomes, R. C. (2022) · Global Public Policy and Governance · doi:10.1007/s43508-022-00055-w · Cited by 105
AI as an organizational agent to nurture: effectively introducing chatbots in public entities
Maragno, G., Tangi, L., Gastaldi, L., & Benedetti, M. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2063935 · Cited by 85
Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation
Barrutia, J. M., Echebarria, C., Moralejo, I. A., Apaolaza, V., & Hartmann, P. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121679 · Cited by 93
Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance
Vassallo, J. P., Banerjee, S., Zaman, H., & Prabhu, J. C. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104768 · Cited by 81
Evaluating e-governance through e-government: Practices and challenges of assessing the digitalisation of public governmental services
Umbach, G., & Tkalec, I. (2022) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102118 · Cited by 73
Participation through place-based e-tools: A valuable resource for urban green infrastructure governance?
Møller, M. S., Olafsson, A. S., Vierikko, K., Sehested, K., Elands, B. H. M., Buijs, A. E., & Konijnendijk, C. C. (2018) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.003 · Cited by 70
Public and private value in citizen participation in E-governance: Evidence from a government-sponsored green commuting platform
Ju, J., Liu, L., & Feng, Y. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101400 · Cited by 83
Government Social Media Engagement Strategies and Public Roles
Wukich, C. (2020) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2020.1851266 · Cited by 69
Social media adoption in the police: Barriers and strategies
Dekker, R., van den Brink, P., & Meijer, A. J. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101441 · Cited by 68
Self-citation
ICT-enabled co-production of public services: Barriers and enablers. A systematic review
Clifton, J., Díaz‐Fuentes, D., & García, G. L. (2019) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-190122 · Cited by 72
A path-dependence perspective on the adoption of Internet of Things: Evidence from early adopters of smart and connected sensors in the United States
Tang, T., & Ho, A. T. (2018) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.010 · Cited by 67
Researching the democratic impact of open government data: A systematic literature review
Ruijer, E. H. J. M., & Martinius, E. (2017) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-170413 · Cited by 62
Public sector innovation in the Asia‐pacific trends, challenges, and opportunities
van der Wal, Z., & Demircioğlu, M. A. (2020) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12435 · Cited by 62
Data-Driven Policy Making: The Policy Lab Approach
van Veenstra, A. F., & Kotterink, B. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64322-9_9 · Cited by 60
How Do Disadvantaged Groups Seek Information About Public Services? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Communication Technologies
Linos, K., Carlson, M., Jakli, L., Dalma, N., Cohen, I., Veloudaki, A., & Spyrellis, S. N. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13437 · Cited by 69
Revisit the drivers and barriers to e-governance in the mobile age: A case study on the adoption of city management mobile apps for smart urban governance
Tang, T., Hou, J., Fay, D. L., & Annis, C. (2019) · Journal of Urban Affairs · doi:10.1080/07352166.2019.1572455 · Cited by 56
Open Data and Transparency: Opportunities and Challenges in the Swiss Context
Cahlikova, T., & Mabillard, V. (2019) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2019.1657914 · Cited by 50
Interpreting digital governance at the municipal level: Evidence from smart city projects in Belgium
Esposito, G., Terlizzi, A., Guarino, M., & Crutzen, N. (2023) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/00208523231167538 · Cited by 49
Cognitions affecting innovation among generation Z entrepreneurs: the external enablement of digital infrastructure
Saeedikiya, M., Salamzadeh, A., Salamzadeh, Y., & Aeeni, Z. (2023) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-02-2023-0188 · Cited by 60
Digital technology-driven smart society governance mechanism and practice exploration
Chen, X., Tang, X., & Xu, X. (2022) · Frontiers of Engineering Management · doi:10.1007/s42524-022-0200-x · Cited by 46
Digital ambidexterity in the public sector: empirical evidence of a bias in balancing practices
Magnusson, J., Päivärinta, T., & Koutsikouri, D. (2020) · Transforming Government People Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/tg-02-2020-0028 · Cited by 53
Key drivers for public value creation enhancing the adoption of electronic public services by citizens
Lopes, K. M. G., Macadar, M. A., & Luciano, E. M. (2019) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-03-2018-0081 · Cited by 42
Cybersecurity Threats in Local Government: A Sociotechnical Perspective
Frandell, A., & Feeney, M. K. (2022) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/02750740221125432 · Cited by 56
Urban design empowerment through ICT-based platforms in Europe
Gün, A., Demir, Y., & Pak, B. (2019) · International Journal of Urban Sciences · doi:10.1080/12265934.2019.1604250 · Cited by 40
Usability of the G7 Open Government Data Portals and Lessons Learned
Mutambik, I., Almuqrin, A., Lee, J. R., Zhang, Z., Alomran, A., Omar, T., Floos, A. Y. M., & Homadi, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132413740 · Cited by 50
Governance, Transparency and the Collaborative Design of Open Data Collaboration Platforms: Understanding Barriers, Options, and Needs
Hogan, M., Ojo, A., Harney, O., Ruijer, E. H. J. M., Meijer, A. J., Andriessen, J. E. B., Pardijs, M., Boscolo, P., Palmisano, E., Satta, M., et al. (2017) · Public administration and information technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63743-3_12 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Smart urban governance: An urgent symbiosis?
Jiang, H., Geertman, S. C. M., & Witte, P. (2019) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-190130 · Cited by 38
The Emerging Digital Twin Bureaucracy in the 21st Century
Eom, S.-J. (2022) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvac005 · Cited by 35
Modeling of role of public leader, open government information and public service performance in Indonesia
Fernandes, A. A. R., & Fresly, J. (2017) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/jmd-12-2016-0322 · Cited by 34
Adoption is not enough: Institutionalization of e-participation initiatives
Рандма-Лийв, Т. (2022) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/09520767211069199 · Cited by 36
Design for inclusive digital co-production
Perikangas, S., & Tuurnas, S. (2023) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2224819 · Cited by 33
Engaging Citizens in Policy Making
Рандма-Лийв, Т., Torres, L., Royo, S., & García‐Rayado, J. (2022) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781800374362 · Cited by 35
Identifying Barriers for Digital Transformation in the Public Sector
Bjerke-Busch, L. S., & Aspelund, A. (2021) · Management for professionals · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69380-0_15 · Cited by 36
Crisis as driver of digital transformation? Scottish local governments’ response to COVID-19
Gangneux, J., & Joss, S. (2022) · Data & Policy · doi:10.1017/dap.2022.18 · Cited by 32
Moderating effects of business-systems corruption on corruption in basic national institutions and electronic government maturity: Insights from a dynamic panel data analysis
Khan, A., & Krishnan, S. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102349 · Cited by 37
Determinants of open innovation adoption in public organizations: a systematic review
Coninck, B. D., Gascó‐Hernández, M., Viaene, S., & Leysen, J. (2021) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.2003106 · Cited by 31
Detection of Digital Law Issues and Implication for Good Governance Policy in Indonesia
Marwan, A., Contreras-Garduno, D. O., & Bonfigli, F. (2022) · BESTUUR · doi:10.20961/bestuur.v10i1.59143 · Cited by 58
Evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence technologies in public services
van Noordt, C., & Misuraca, G. C. (2020) · International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance · doi:10.1145/3428502.3428504 · Cited by 35
Barriers to Innovation and the Innovative Performance of Portuguese Firms
Madeira, M. J., Carvalho, J., Moreira, J., Duarte, F., & Filho, F. D. S. P. (2017) · Journal of Business · doi:10.21678/jb.2017.822 · Cited by 30
Challenges and Opportunities for Information Resource Management for E-Governance in Bangladesh
Sarker, M. N. I., Wu, M., Liu, R., & Ma, C. (2018) · Lecture notes on multidisciplinary industrial engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93351-1_53 · Cited by 30
Building a culture of innovation: How do agency leadership and management systems promote innovative activities within the government?
Park, N., Cho, M., & Lee, J. W. (2021) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12474 · Cited by 30
Long-term effects of COVID-19 on work routines and organizational culture – A case study within higher education’s administration
Müller, L. S., Reiners, S., Becker, J., & Hertel, G. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113927 · Cited by 46
Public service logic and the creation of value propositions through framing
Røhnebæk, M., François, V., Kiss, N., Peralta, A., Rubalcaba, L., Strokosch, K., & Zhu, E. Y. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2095002 · Cited by 28
Managing urban infrastructure assets in the digital era: challenges of municipal digital transformation
Lafioune, N., Poirier, E. A., & St-Jacques, M. (2023) · Digital Transformation and Society · doi:10.1108/dts-02-2023-0010 · Cited by 26
Unlocking green potential: How open government data enhances green economic efficiency in China?
Lv, L., & Zhang, P. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125043 · Cited by 29
Digital Transformation through e-Government Innovation in Uzbekistan
Sang-Chul, S., Ho, J.-W., & Yuryevich, P. V. (2020) · International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology · doi:10.23919/icact48636.2020.9061507 · Cited by 26
Mechanisms Influencing the Digital Transformation Performance of Local Governments: Evidence from China
Zhou, W., Lyu, Z., & Chen, S. (2024) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems12010030 · Cited by 25
A tension lens for understanding public innovation diffusion processes
Hong, Q., & Chreim, S. (2021) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1942532 · Cited by 26
Public Value in the Perception of Citizens from the Perspective of Smart Cities
Salmoria, F. T., Júnior, L. A. F., de Guimarães, J. C. F., Nodari, C. H., & Guimarães, L. G. D. A. (2021) · BAR - Brazilian Administration Review · doi:10.1590/1807-7692bar2021200116 · Cited by 27
Coping with digital transformation in frontline public services: A study of user adaptation in policing
Afzal, M. Y., & Panagiotopoulos, P. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101977 · Cited by 43
Smart Mobility for Smart Cities—Electromobility Solution Analysis and Development Directions
Tundys, B., & Wiśniewski, T. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16041958 · Cited by 24
Assessing citizens’ non-adoption of public e-services in Germany
Distel, B. (2020) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-190214 · Cited by 23
A conceptual digital policy framework via mixed-methods approach: Navigating public value for value-driven digital transformation
Lee, J.-Y., Kim, B., & Yoon, S.-H. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101961 · Cited by 32
Varieties of public–private co-governance on cybersecurity within the digital trade: implications from Huawei’s 5G
Huang, K., Madnick, S., Zhang, F., & Siegel, M. (2021) · Journal of Chinese Governance · doi:10.1080/23812346.2021.1923230 · Cited by 23
Breaking through barriers: the impact of organizational culture on open government reform
Ruijer, E. H. J. M., & Huff, R. (2016) · Transforming Government People Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/tg-07-2015-0028 · Cited by 23
ICT Use in Central Government: Scope, Predictors and Effects on Coordination Quality
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2020) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2020.1851256 · Cited by 22
Barriers to innovation activities as determinants of ongoing activities or abandoned
Duarte, F., Madeira, M. J., Moura, D. C., Carvalho, J., & Moreira, J. (2017) · International Journal of Innovation Science · doi:10.1108/ijis-01-2017-0006 · Cited by 21
Evaluating the Performance of E-Government in Indonesia
Sabani, A., Deng, H., & Vinh Van, T. H. A. I. (2019) · International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance · doi:10.1145/3326365.3326422 · Cited by 20
Exploring emergent collaborations for digital transformation in local governments: The engagement of public libraries in the development of smart cities
Buyannemekh, B., Gil-García, J. R., & Gascó‐Hernández, M. (2023) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/09520767231197600 · Cited by 29
Collaborating for Digital Transformation
Verhoest, K., Hammerschmid, G., Rykkja, L. H., & Klijn, E.-H. (2024) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781803923895 · Cited by 24
Technological innovation in a police organization: Lessons learned from the National Police of the Netherlands
Ernst, S., ter Veen, H., & Kop, N. (2021) · Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice · doi:10.1093/police/paab003 · Cited by 19
Artificial Intelligence Adoption for E-Government
Fetais, A. H. M. A., Faisal, M. N., Sabir, L. B., & Al-Esmael, B. A. (2022) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/ijegr.300773 · Cited by 21
Governance rules for managing smart city information
Landsbergen, D., Girth, A. M., & Westover-Muñoz, A. (2022) · Urban Governance · doi:10.1016/j.ugj.2022.05.003 · Cited by 37
Smart City Development as Public Entrepreneurship: An In-Depth Case Study of Mayoral Action Based on Actor-Network Theory
Esposito, G., Terlizzi, A., Desdemoustier, J., Pichault, F., & Crutzen, N. (2024) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2024.2329672 · Cited by 19
Citizens’ role and digitalisation in the participatory budgeting to create public value: the case of Rome
Santolamazza, V., Mattei, G., & Grandis, F. G. (2024) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-05-2023-0165 · Cited by 30

Authors: Meijer, A.
Affiliations: Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author: Meijer, Albert
ORCID: Meijer, Albert
Venue: Government Information Quarterly
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2015-04
Volume: 32
Issue: 2
Pages: 198-206
ISSN: 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001
OpenAlex: W2043759429
Semantic Scholar: c308108b3d727d9e69a5212b6d74e8d23f884e0b
Cited by: 365
References: 48
Citations by year: 2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 7
FWCI: 104.03
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Government Information Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics: Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords: digital governance, e-government adoption, barriers to innovation, innovation process, structural barriers, cultural barriers, framing strategies, public value, technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks