An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital open government websites have become a common government policy to increase transparency.
“Such digital open government websites have become a common government policy to increase transparency (e.g.Lourenço, 2015).”
From Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments (2020) · cites this paper as Lourenço, 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 329
- Authors
- Lourenço, R. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Coimbra (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Lourenço, Rui Pedro
- ORCID
- Lourenço, Rui Pedro
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 323-332
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W560871064
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 138.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Government Information Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (OE/EEI/UI308/2014)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Administrative Law and Governance
- Keywords
- open data, transparency, accountability, data disclosure, data organization, Data.gov, citizen participation, public accountability, transparency assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
