The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The public value of E-Government – A literature review
Open accessAbstract
This study organizes existing research on the public value of e-government in order to investigate the current state and what value e-government is supposed to yield. The two questions that guided the research were: (1) What is the current state of research on the public value of e-government? And (2) What value is e-government supposed to yield? Six, sometimes overlapping, values were found: Improved public services; improved administrative efficiency; Open Government (OG) capabilities; improved ethical behaviour and professionalism; improved trust and confidence in government; and improved social value and well-being. These six public value dimensions were thereafter generalized into three overarching, and also overlapping, public value dimensions of Improved Public Services, Improved Administration, and Improved Social Value. The improved public services dimension influences other dimensions. Hence, this literature study theorizes a descriptive and multidimensional framework that can improve our understanding of the public value of e-government from different viewpoints, and the overlap between them in actual e-government designs and implementations. Regarding the current state of research on the public value this study found a lack of research on the public value of e-government, especially, in the context of developing countries – and more importantly – a total absence of this kind of research in the Least Developed Countries (LDCs). There is also a lack of comparative studies at national, regional, and project level; and a lack of research on the generative perspective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effects of E‐Government on Trust and Confidence in Government
Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x · Cited by 1,092
Analyzing the past to prepare for the future
(2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017160.2017162 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-07-2019-0178 · Cited by 339
Gong, Y., Yang, J., & Shi, X. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101487 · Cited by 301
Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda
Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917 · Cited by 266
Public value creation in digital government
Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421 · Cited by 265
Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: The case of social services
Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.004 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-178
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912099040
- Cited by
- 954
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 399.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.