Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda
Open accessAbstract
Digital transformation has become a buzzword that is permeating multiple fields, including public administration and management. However, it is unclear what is transformational and how incremental and transformational change processes are linked. Using the PRISMA method, we conduct a systematic literature review to structure this growing body of evidence. We identified 164 studies on digitally-induced change and provide evidence for their drivers, implementation processes, and outcomes. We derive a theoretical framework that shows which incremental changes happen in public administrations that are implementing digital technologies and what their cumulative, transformative effects are on society as a whole.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 · Cited by 13,874 · see citing works
Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method
Bowen, G. A. (2009) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.3316/qrj0902027 · Cited by 13,013 · see citing works
Creating public value: strategic management in government
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4147 · Cited by 2,551 · see citing works
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12639 · Cited by 2,550 · see citing works
Creating public value : strategic management in government
Moore, M. H. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,356 · see citing works
Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & de Ven, A. H. V. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.4001 · Cited by 2,316 · see citing works
Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 · Cited by 1,990 · see citing works
Self-citationDigital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective
Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004 · Cited by 1,537 · see citing works
Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4209 · Cited by 1,303 · see citing works
The public value of E-Government – A literature review
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001 · Cited by 954 · see citing works
Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy
AlNuaimi, B. K., Kumar Singh, S., Ren, S., Budhwar, P., & Vorobyev, D. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.038 · Cited by 820 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the case of transformative change new managerial work practices, such as agile management are introduced that require a re-organization of organizational planning and decision-making (AlNuaimi et al. 2022).”
BackgroundICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection
Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. (2012) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
The management of change in public organizations: A literature review
KUIPERS, B. S., HIGGS, M., KICKERT, W., TUMMERS, L., GRANDIA, J., & VAN DER VOET, J. (2014) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12040 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
On being ‘Systematic’ in Literature Reviews in IS
Boell, S. K., & Ćećez-Kecmanović, D. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2014.26 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Cycles of organizational change
Mintzberg, H., & Westley, F. R. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250130905 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Local E‐Government in the United States: Transformation or Incremental Change?
Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2012) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02647.x · Cited by 382 · see citing works
New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery
Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2021) · Public Money & Management · doi:10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States
Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K., & McNeal, R. (2008) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Borins, S. (2000) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00113 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments
Pittaway, J. J., & Montazemi, A. R. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101474 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework
Bertot, J. C., Estévez, E., & Janowski, T. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.004 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: The Italian case
Cordella, A., & Paletti, A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101409 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare
Schou, J., & Pors, A. S. (2019) · Social Policy & Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.12470 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
DePaula, N., Dincelli, E., & Harrison, T. M. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.003 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Vogl, T. M., Seidelin, C., Ganesh, B., & Bright, J. (2020) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13286 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
MacLean, D., & Titah, R. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13413 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Andersson, C., Hallin, A., & Ivory, C. J. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101662 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Imbert, C., Mathew, S., & Pande, R. (2020) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20180302 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Why E-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia's Osale.ee
Toots, M. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.002 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Understanding the rise of e-participation in non-democracies: Domestic and international factors
Åström, J., Karlsson, M., Linde, J., & Pirannejad, A. (2012) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.008 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Kuhlmann, S., & Heuberger, M. (2021) · Public Money & Management · doi:10.1080/09540962.2021.1939584 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Qualitative approach to determine user experience of e-government services
Kumar, R., Sachan, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.023 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
A longitudinal study of e-government maturity
Das, A., Singh, H., & Joseph, D. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.09.006 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Avoiding Theoretical Stagnation: A Systematic Review and Framework for Measuring Public Value
Faulkner, N., & Kaufman, S. (2017) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12251 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
The Business Models and Information Architectures of Smart Cities
Kuk, G., & Janssen, M. (2011) · Journal of Urban Technology · doi:10.1080/10630732.2011.601109 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Jones, S. R., Irani, Z., Sivarajah, U., & Love, P. E. D. (2017) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9756-0 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Are small cities online? Content, ranking, and variation of U.S. municipal websites
Feeney, M. K., & Brown, A. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.10.005 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Tassabehji, R., Hackney, R., & Popovič, A. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.003 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Weerakkody, V., Omar, A., El‐Haddadeh, R., & Al‐Busaidy, M. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.006 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Social media in public health care: Impact domain propositions
Andersen, K. N., Medaglia, R., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2012) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.004 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Technological capacity in the public sector: the case of Estonia
Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Tõnurist, P. (2018) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852317735164 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Assessing the Impact of E-government: A Study of Projects in India
Bhatnagar, S. C., & Singh, N. (2010) · Information Technologies and International Development · Cited by 84 · see citing works
E-Government Use and Perceived Government Transparency and Service Capacity
Jun, K.-N., Feng, W., & Wang, D. (2014) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576380106 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Implementation of Digital‐Era Governance: The Case of Open Data in U.S. Cities
Young, M. (2020) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13156 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Feeney, M. K., & Welch, E. W. (2014) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074014547413 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Urban E-Government Initiatives and Environmental Decision Performance in Korea
Lim, J., & Tang, S. Y. (2006) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum005 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
E-government implementation strategies in developed and transition economies: A comparative study
Weerakkody, V., El‐Haddadeh, R., Sabol, T., Ghoneim, A., & Džupka, P. (2011) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.10.005 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
The influence of transformed government on citizen trust: insights from Bahrain
Mahmood, M., Weerakkody, V., & Chen, W. (2018) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2018.1451980 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2019) · Journal of Chinese Governance · doi:10.1080/23812346.2019.1698693 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Organizational structure and ICT strategies in the Brazilian Judiciary System
Andrade, A., & Jóia, L. A. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.003 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Designing digital public service supply chains: four country-based cases in criminal justice
Seepma, A. P., Blok, C. D., & van Donk, D. P. (2020) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-03-2019-0111 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Increasing citizen participation in e-participatory budgeting processes
Mærøe, A. R., Norta, A., Tsap, V., & Pappel, I. (2020) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2020.1821421 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Kim, S., & Kim, D. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12083421 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
The complexities of electronic services implementation and institutionalisation in the public sector
El‐Haddadeh, R., Weerakkody, V., & Al‐Shafi, S. (2013) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.02.005 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The impact of digitalization in the public sector: a systematic literature review
Fischer, C., Heuberger, M., & Heine, M. (2021) · dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy Recht und Management · doi:10.3224/dms.v14i1.13 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Conflicts in implementing interoperability: Re-operationalizing basic values
Hellberg, A.-S., & Grönlund, Å. (2013) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.006 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Is e-government a way to e-democracy?
Kardan, A. A., & Sadeghiani, A. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.12.007 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Arduini, D., Denni, M., Lucchese, M., Nurra, A., & Zanfei, A. (2013) · Structural Change and Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.007 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Two decades of e-government diffusion among local governments in the United States
Epstein, B. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101665 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Schulz, D., & Newig, J. (2014) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.1655 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Feeney, M. K., Fusi, F., Camarena, L., & Zhang, F. (2019) · Local Government Studies · doi:10.1080/03003930.2019.1690993 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
E-Government Web Portal Adoption: The Effects of Service Quality
Jiang, & Ji (2014) · e-Service Journal · doi:10.2979/eservicej.9.3.43 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Liste, L., & Sørensen, K. H. (2015) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.993678 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
E-Government in Spain: An Analysis of the Right to Quality E-Government
Molina, M. D. M. (2009) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900690903178454 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Krøtel, S. M. L. (2019) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1672182 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Nan, Z., Lu, Z., & Shou, Y. (2017) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2017.1363030 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Citizenship in the age of the Internet: a comparative analysis of Britain and Turkey
Polat, R. K., & Pratchett, L. (2013) · Citizenship Studies · doi:10.1080/13621025.2013.780765 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
A Cross‑Cultural Study on e‑Government Services Delivery
Nguyễn, N. Á. (2016) · Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Kassen, M. (2018) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852317735595 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Enang, I., Asenova, D., & BAILEY, S. J. (2020) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852319896399 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Information Technology and Organizational Morphology: The Case of the Korean Central Government
Im, T. (2011) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02227.x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Imbrications of institutional logics: the case of an e‐government initiative in G reece
Hayes, N., Introna, L. D., & Petrakaki, D. (2014) · New Technology Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12029 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Taking Stock of Russian eGovernment
Zherebtsov, M. (2019) · Europe Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2019.1590535 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A cultural theory analysis of e-government: Insights from a local government council in Malaysia
Jackson, S., & Wong, M. S. (2016) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-016-9652-z · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Assessment of efficiency in public service – focused on Government 3.0 case in Korea
Seo, I., Kim, Y., & Choi, J. (2018) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2018.1487596 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Searching for Impacts in Performance-Oriented Management Reform
Pollitt, C., & Dan, S. (2013) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576370101 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationNegotiating e-politics: Initiating e-government in a municipal council in Kenya
Klopp, J. M., Marcello, E. M., Kirui, G., & Mwangi, H. (2013) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-130294 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organizing public sector AI adoption: Navigating between separation and integration
Selten, F., & Klievink, B. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101885 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Yang, X., Ran, R., Chen, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114017 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Atobishi, T., Moh’d Abu Bakir, S., & Nosratabadi, S. (2024) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci14020037 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“…intelligence on innovation and responsiveness has achieved extensive study in Western contexts, far less scholarship examines digitally enabled performance linkages within developing country public institutions undertaking e-governance initiatives (Haug et al. 2023; Pittaway and Montazemi 2020).”
BackgroundMeng, C., Wang, L., & Lin, Y. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122179 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Jia, Y., Cui, L., Su, J., Wu, L., Akter, S., & Kumar, A. (2024) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109434 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Digital innovation strategies in the public sector
Guenduez, A. A., Demircioğlu, M. A., Mueller, E. M., & Cinar, E. (2025) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2025.105274 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Uncovering the Results of AI Chatbot Use in the Public Sector: Evidence from US State Governments
Chen, T.-L., & Gascó-Hernández, M. (2024) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2024.2389864 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“Third, as previous research on digital transformation highlights (e.g., Haug et al., 2023; Mergel et al., 2019), in the last few years, new digital channels, such as websites and social media, have improved communication between public organizations and citizens.”
InfluentialTanveer, U., Hoang, T. G., Ishaq, S., & Khalid, R. U. (2025) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124270 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Public value management in digital transformation: a scoping review
Zyzak, B., Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K., & Jensen, M. R. (2024) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-02-2024-0055 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Afzal, M. Y., & Panagiotopoulos, P. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101977 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Febiri, F., Gariba, M. I., Hub, M., & Provazníková, R. (2024) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100424 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Yi, D., & Sun, Y. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2024.2370982 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Nonetheless, why the impact of technology application is opposite at macro and micro levels remains an interesting area worth exploring in future research (Haug, Dan, and Mergel 2023; Mergel et al. 2023).”
Digital Transformation of Public Services: The Case of the Document Management Application
Szedmák, B., Varga, L., & Szabó, R. Z. (2025) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2025.2520522 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“To reflect this comprehensive approach, Haug et al. (2023) use the term digitally induced change instead of digital transformation in order to highlight that technology lays the foundations for transformative endeavors, but the primary effort and transformative potential are within the…”
Bridging Governance and Technology: Key Determinants of AI Adoption in Public Administration
Ly, B. (2025) · Chinese Political Science Review · doi:10.1007/s41111-025-00308-z · Cited by 22 · see citing works
AlKaabi, S., Hazzam, J., Wilkins, S., & Dan, S. (2024) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2024.2367130 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“Public service innovations can be both incremental and small scale, as well as transformative and large scale (Haug et al., 2023; Scott, 2021).”
Self-citationRan, R., Yang, X., Liu, Z., Wang, Q., & Chen, Y. (2024) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-024-09899-x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Strengthening Resilience: Social Responsibility and Citizen Participation in Local Governance
Hernández, M. I. S. (2024) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci14100260 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Furthermore, institutional change in public administration is evident in the adoption of new technologies, practices, and policies that reflect evolving societal values and norms, as has been demonstrated by Gasc ó (2003) or Haug et al. (2024).”
Esperança, M., Freitas, D. C. D. C. V., Paixão, P. V., Marcos, T. A., Martins, R. A., & Ferreira, J. C. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15126673 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Barbu, A., Ichimov, M. A. M., Costea-Marcu, I.-C., Militaru, G., Deselnicu, D. C., & Moiceanu, G. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15010045 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Recently, concerns related to digitization and the use of digital technologies both within the public sector (Haug et al., 2024; Lei et al., 2024) and the private sector (Ham-merschmid et al., 2024) have become more severe.”
Cao, Z., Lu, J., & Sun, R. (2025) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2025.104552 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Jiao, W.-K., Zhang, C., & Wang, Y. (2025) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2025.104353 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Islam, M. K., Bhuiyan, M. R. I., Islam, S. H., Tabassum, M. N., & Billah, M. (2026) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/5593002 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Tomaževič, N., Murko, E., & Aristovnik, A. (2024) · Central European Public Administration Review · doi:10.17573/cepar.2024.1.05 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“…adoption in the public sector, several detailed literature reviews have already been performed (e.g., de Sousa et al., 2019; Dwivedi et al., 2019; Haug et al., 2023; Ishengoma et al., 2022; Mergel et al., 2023; Pencheva et al., 2020; van Noordt and Misuraca, 2022; Zuiderwijk et al., 2022) in an…”
BackgroundPulkkinen, J., Huttu, K., & Suhonen, M. (2025) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-06-2025-0309 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Digitalization in the public sector should indeed be viewed as a systemic phenomenon where technological, organizational, and environmental factors are intertwined (Haug et al ., 2023; Mergel et al ., 2019).”
Liminal digital transformation in public sector: The case of UK policing
Gritt, E., Forsgren, E., & Pandža, K. (2024) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101851 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Civil servants’ readiness for AI adoption: The role of change management in Morocco’s public sector
Barodi, M., & Lalaoui, S. (2025) · Problems and Perspectives in Management · doi:10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.05 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Theoretically, digitization is the dematerialization of procedures, where information and communication technologies play a crucial role in converting data from paper to digital format, thereby stream-lining administrative operations (Mammadli & Klivak, 2020; Haug et al., 2024).”
Lubis, S., Nurmandi, A., Ahmad, J., Purnomo, E. P., Purwaningsih, T., & Jovita, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Sustainable Cities · doi:10.3389/frsc.2025.1553816 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Liu, J., Siano, P., & Wu, K. (2025) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.134620 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Hamouche, S., Bani‐Melhem, S., Haj‐Salem, N., Alraeesi, A. A. M. A., & Bani-Melhem, A. J. (2025) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-02-2025-0094 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Cloud computing in the Polish public administration: current state and development prospects
Brzozowska‐Rup, K., Nowakowska, M., & Zdradzisz, M. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123500 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Nagel, M. L. (2024) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997241296100 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“The digital transformation of societies all around the globe has created both new opportunities and difficulties for governments (Haug et al., 2024).”
Pathways to e-participation diffusion: A societal and governance perspective
Cezar, A. (2024) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2024.102177 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Digital transformation and the accounting for intangible assets in the public sector
Heiling, J. (2025) · Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management · doi:10.1108/jpbafm-09-2024-0177 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Unpacking Approaches to Digitalization Strategy
Kühler, J., Polzer, T., Proeller, I., Kuhlmann, S., & Marienfeldt, J. (2025) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.13070 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“This also explains why the newest technologies, such as AI, are taken up, but in a rather piecemeal and unsystematic manner (Haug et al. 2023) and are promoted or opposed by political and managerial actors.”
InfluentialFan, Z. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2024.2339956 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…the factors that potentially hinder the e-government implementation process (Fan, Meng, and Wei 2020; Grimmelikhuijsen and Feeney 2017; Hansen and Nørup 2017; Haug, Dan, and Mergel 2023; Jun and Weare 2011; Neumann, Guirguis, and Steiner 2024; F. Zhang and Feeney 2020; H. Zhang, Xu, and Xiao 2014).”
Haq, S. H. U., Dan, S., & Shahzad, K. (2024) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-12-2023-0347 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationDavid, S., Vîrlănuța, F. O., Bacalum, S., Bărbuță‐Mișu, N., & MIHAI, I. O. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · doi:10.1002/cjas.70007 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Digital internal bordering: surveillance, data-sharing, and the fate of sanctuary cities
Humphris, R., Hudson, G., & Bazurli, R. (2025) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2025.2513166 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“The case of AI is especially consequential as it could change the nature of migration management and welfare states entirely (Bircan and Korkmaz 2021; Haug, Dan, and Mergel 2024).”
Accounting for digital promises: restoring and transforming promissory narratives
Carlsson‐Wall, M., Laurell, C., Parbratt, O. L., & Ots, M. (2024) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-12-2022-6232 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Challenges and Solutions for Sustainable ICT: The Role of File Storage
Mersico, L., Abroshan, H., Sanchez-Velazquez, E., Saheer, L. B., Simandjuntak, S., Dhar-Bhattacharjee, S., Al-Haddad, R., Saeed, N. H., & Saxena, A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16188043 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Joaquim, R., Jorge, S., & Pimentel, L. M. (2025) · Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change · doi:10.1108/jaoc-11-2023-0201 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Egba, V. N., Ukeje, I. O., Ayanwale, M. A., Robinson, D. F., Ejem, E. N., Nwaigwe, H. C., Akonye, J. E., & Osuebi, K. T. (2026) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-026-01372-1 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Kommunale Verwaltungsdigitalisierung im föderalen Kontext: ein europäischer Ländervergleich
Marienfeldt, J., Kühler, J., Kuhlmann, S., & Proeller, I. (2024) · dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy Recht und Management · doi:10.3224/dms.v17i1.03 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Sufficient and Necessary Enablers of Digitalization in Public Institutions
Ștefan, S. C., Simion, C.-P., Breazu, A., Mircioiu, C.-E., & VIȘAN, D. A. M. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2025.3568065 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Although prior studies have analyzed internal and external factors influencing digitalization and the implementation of certain DTs [8], [9], [28], [29], several research gaps remain, which this research seeks to address.”
InfluentialVissing, K. N., Knoll, M. H., & Hertzum, M. (2025) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102051 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Wang, Z., & Qu, W. G. (2026) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-026-09937-w · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Jo, H. (2025) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102883 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Komna, L., & Mpungose, S. (2024) · International Journal of Business Ecosystem and Strategy (2687-2293) · doi:10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.610 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Assessing the effect of digitalisation on a public “self-servicing” service
Garlatti, A., Iacuzzi, S., Pauluzzo, R., & Pericolo, E. (2025) · Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management · doi:10.1108/jpbafm-09-2024-0186 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Leadership and Mediation Approaches for Social Cohesion in the Greek Public Sector
Aravidou, K., Triantari, S., & Zervas, I. M. (2025) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci15070248 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Navigating Digital Transformation? The Guiding Role and Socialization Processes of Change Agents
Fischer, C., & Breaugh, J. (2025) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.70024 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Amirova, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2025.1679601 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
van Duijn, S., Bannink, D., & van Doorn, M. (2025) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-03-2025-0106 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Balancing Digital Transformation and Modernization: Pathways for Public Managers
Picavet, M. E. B., Desouza, K. C., Dawson, G. S., Denford, J. S., & Chenok, D. (2026) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.70092 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Finally, Haug et al. (2023) found that the outcomes of digital transformation efforts in the public sector improve citizens' access to online services and information, leading to better relationships and improved/new forms of service delivery.”
InfluentialGoverning the Local Digital Transformation: A European Comparative Perspective
Kuhlmann, S., Marienfeldt, J., & Ganz, F. (2026) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.70061 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Zeng, Y., Raymond, J., Brown, C., Byari, M., & Rounsevell, M. (2025) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111032 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Transformação digital no setor público: tendências e implicações
de Albuquerque, M. R., & Costa, L. (2025) · Revista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review) · doi:10.7769/gesec.v16i3.4771 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Tan, E., Dan, S., & Shahzad, K. (2024) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-01-2025-384 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationDigital Government Construction and Common Prosperity in China: Effect and Transmission Channel
Xiong, B., Yu, B., & Tang, Y. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17209047 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
When digitalisation enhances public (in)efficiency
Moggi, S., Zardini, A., & Rossignoli, C. (2025) · Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management · doi:10.1108/jpbafm-10-2024-0216 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Zhang, C., Wu, S., Dong, Y., & Jiang, M. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su172310700 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Denford, J. S., Dawson, G. S., & Desouza, K. C. (2025) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102078 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Design Strategies in Public Services
Cucciniello, M., Nasi, G., Porumbescu, G. A., & Tarricone, R. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009451734 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kumar, M., Ranajee, R., Zia, A., & Vandana, V. (2026) · International Journal of Innovation Science · doi:10.1108/ijis-02-2025-0090 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Bonollo, E. (2025) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1080/14778238.2025.2494772 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“To minimise bias and ensure replicability of this process, the search followed the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al., 2021), which have been previously applied to public management research (e.g., Haug et al., 2023; Valle-Cruz et al., 2023).”
InfluentialFinancial fragility in older adults: a systematic review of the literature
Oriol, E. D. C., Gomes, R. C., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2025) · Journal of Policy Studies · doi:10.52372/jps.250215 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Introduction to the smart city code
Mora, L., Gerli, P., Beckers, D., Thabit, S., & Tonnarelli, F. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-13402-9.00008-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Jarvers, S., & Schachtner, C. (2024) · Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days · doi:10.1145/3670243.3670261 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Digital Transformation in Africa
Maseko, M. (2024) · Advances in finance, accounting, and economics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0477-8.ch019 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Novello, N., & Garavaglia, E. (2025) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x25100305 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Men, Y., Xu, Y., Yang, K., Wang, Z., & Ji, X. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05932-3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Cyberfare State: divergent models of digital governance and control
Kelemen, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2026.1748562 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Open to open-source AI? Navigating AI model choice in public sector agencies
Robinson, N. (2026) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2026.102133 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Hegemann, M., & Ritz, A. (2026) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvag004 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Dekker, R., Alajak, K., Leurs, K., Schans, D., & Salah, A. A. (2025) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2025.2561109 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sikalo, M. (2025) · State Formation · doi:10.26565/1992-2337-2025-1-11 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
New Perspectives on Intergovernmental Relations
Kuhlmann, S., Laffin, M., Wayenberg, E., & Bergström, T. B. (2024) · Palgrave studies in sub-national governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61790-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
AI-Driven Transformation in Public Governance
Gomes, P. M., & Cardoso, T. J. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9286-7.ch005 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Digitalization in Public Administration
Singh, B., Ahmed, S., & Wongmahesak, K. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9286-7.ch004 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Public Opinion and it’s Influence on Technology Governance in the Age of Digital Transformation
Dang, C. (2025) · International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering · doi:10.22399/ijcesen.1406 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Jafari, P., Looy, A. V., & Helbin, T. (2025) · Journal of Advances in Management Research · doi:10.1108/jamr-11-2024-0412 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Innovation interrupted: The gap between value creation and evaluation in the public sector
Isik, L. (2025) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102035 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Atukpa, E. I., Durokifa, A. A., Ukeje, I. O., Akor, I. C., Joseph, A. E., Nwaigwe, H. C., & Arinze, A. I. (2025) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-025-01148-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Robotic process automation: implementation in a multi-municipal water supply and sanitation company
Martins, A., Silva, A. P., GOMES, D. R. D. R., & Cruz, D. V. S. (2025) · Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management · doi:10.1108/jpbafm-09-2024-0182 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
DIGITALISATION DEVELOPMENT AS AN ANTI-CORRUPTION TOOL FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Hetmanenko, O., & Tyvodar, B. (2025) · Baltic Journal of Economic Studies · doi:10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-4-316-326 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Aluko, K., Ayentimi, D. T., Moloney, B., & Burgess, J. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.1111/1744-7941.70049 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A digital participation transformation in the chinese local government: A bibliometric analysis
Xinru, W., & Manaf, H. B. A. (2025) · Multidisciplinary Reviews · doi:10.31893/multirev.2026273 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
When GenAI writes public foresight reports: Effects on convincing citizens
Zumbrunn, L., & Guenduez, A. A. (2025) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/09520767251403049 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Governments have embraced technological advancements as part of a broader process of digital government transformation and innovation (Guenduez et al., 2025; Haug et al., 2023).”
Chen, C., Ahmad, A. B., Liu, M., & Wen, P. (2026) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2026.102105 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Spanò, R., Kuruppu, S., GOMES, D. R. D. R., & Iacuzzi, S. (2026) · Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management · doi:10.1108/jpbafm-11-2025-0334 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
AI as a tool to enhance corporate governance compliance in the public sector in Kuwait
Alajmi, A. E. (2026) · Corporate Governance · doi:10.1108/cg-09-2024-0493 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Røste, R., & Geirbo, H. C. (2026) · Information Polity · doi:10.1177/15701255251413506 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“…change as a holistic process involving a transition from existing analogue services that co-evolve with changes in professional skills, the creation of new organizational cultures, and a change in the mindsets of people working in the organization (Haug et al., 2024; Mergel et al., 2019).”
InfluentialZhang, J., & He, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2026.1740695 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Zhou, L., & Wu, J. (2026) · Public Administration and Development · doi:10.1002/pad.70062 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…with private sector stakeholders is an important form for the public sector to advance its digital transformation (Buyannemekh et al. 2023; Haug et al. 2023), as the private‐sector stakeholders have advantages in the research, development, and application of ICT (Clement et al. 2022;…”
Transformación digital en el sector público: eficiencia con riesgos sociales
Trujillo, R. A. (2026) · Perfiles Latinoamericanos · doi:10.18504/pl3467-003-2026 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Karnsomdee, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2026.1732138 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“According to recent studies, smart government supports innovation, sustainability, and participatory governance, resulting in adaptive and resilient public sector systems (Charalabidis and Lachana, 2020; Haug et al., 2024).”
Driving digital village development for rural modernization: The evidence of China
Cheng, D., Liu, J., 臧雷振, & Zhao, Y. (2026) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104242 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Khajoueinejad, Z., & Scott, S. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-026-00608-7
“It relates to the judicious use of resources in executing DU strategies and teaching processes (Brdesee, 2021; Fernández et al., 2023; Haug et al., 2023; Kupriyanova et al., 2018; Virani & van der Wal, 2023).”
Forged through forces: configurations to digital policy attention in local governments
Wang, T., Zhong, C., Wang, G., & Qin, L. (2026) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2026.2690239 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Public-sector digital transformation in the age of generative AI
Jonathan, G. M. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02077-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“This finding aligns closely with adjacent systematic reviews [10, 17, 18] and reinforces the argument that DT outcomes depend fundamentally on organisational adaptation rather than technological investment alone.”
- Authors
- Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- University of Vaasa (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Haug, Nathalie
- Venue
- Public Management Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-07-13
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1963-1987
- ISSN
- 1461-667X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9037
- 1471-9045
- OpenAlex
- W4384341083
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 137 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 49.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Public Management Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Osuva (University of Vaasa) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- he European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No (770356)
- project CoVal. This article reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained herein
- The article is also part of research supported by Liikesivistysrahasto – The Foundation for Economic Education in Finland (200264)
- This project received funding from the European Union under grant agreement (101061516)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Keywords
- digital transformation, public sector, public administration, incremental change, transformative change, digital technologies, drivers of change, implementation process, change outcomes, social impact
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review