The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The perils and pitfalls of explainable AI: Strategies for explaining algorithmic decision-making
Open accessAbstract
Governments look at explainable artificial intelligence's (XAI) potential to tackle the criticisms of the opaqueness of algorithmic decision-making with AI. Although XAI is appealing as a solution for automated decisions, the wicked nature of the challenges governments face complicates the use of XAI. Wickedness means that the facts that define a problem are ambiguous and that there is no consensus on the normative criteria for solving this problem. In such a situation, the use of algorithms can result in distrust. Whereas there is much research advancing XAI technology, the focus of this paper is on strategies for explainability. Three illustrative cases are used to show that explainable, data-driven decisions are often not perceived as objective by the public. The context might raise strong incentives to contest and distrust the explanation of AI, and as a consequence, fierce resistance from society is encountered. To overcome the inherent problems of XAI, decisions-specific strategies are proposed to lead to societal acceptance of AI-based decisions. We suggest strategies to embrace explainable decisions and processes, co-create decisions with societal actors, move away from an instrumental to an institutional approach, use competing and value-sensitive algorithms, and mobilize the tacit knowledge of professionals
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In complex public-law settings, explanations are embedded in contested legal standards, institutional purposes and discretionary judgments (de Bruijn et al., 2022;Oswald, 2018).”
From From Human Oversight to Cognitive Sovereignty: A Process-Based Governance Standard for AI-Assisted Legal Reasoning (2026) · cites this paper as de Bruijn et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“De Bruijn, Warnier and Janssen (2022) show that explainable AI is not a simple cure for public-sector algorithmic decisionmaking because explanations operate within contested legal and administrative contexts.”
From From Human Oversight to Cognitive Sovereignty: A Process-Based Governance Standard for AI-Assisted Legal Reasoning (2026) · cites this paper as De Bruijn, Warnier and Janssen (2022)
In the citing paper
“Explainable AI, at least in its current form, may not address the informational needs of laypeople, politicians, professionals, or scientists because the information is too technical [58].”
From The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2025) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“there is very little agreement about what explainability means in practice, because what makes AI explainable depends on the context of its use [58].”
From The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2025) · cites this paper as [58]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
On Pixel-Wise Explanations for Non-Linear Classifier Decisions by Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation
Bach, S., Binder, A., Montavon, G., Klauschen, F., Müller, K.-R., & Samek, W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130140 · Cited by 4,524
Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks
Montavon, G., Samek, W., & Müller, K.-R. (2018) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2017.10.011 · Cited by 2,665
Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287598 · Cited by 1,631
Explaining nonlinear classification decisions with deep taylor decomposition
Montavon, G., Lapuschkin, S., Binder, A., Samek, W., & Müller, K.-R. (2017) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2016.11.008 · Cited by 1,357
Zhang, Y., & Wallace, B. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.03820 · Cited by 1,336
Techniques for interpretable machine learning
Du, M., Liu, N., & Hu, X. (2019) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3359786 · Cited by 1,268
Samek, W., Wiegand, T., & Müller, K.-R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.08296 · Cited by 1,080
Friedman, B. (1996) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/242485.242493 · Cited by 966
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- LeCun, 2015, Deep learning., 521, 436
- McDonald, 2019, AI system for granting UK visas is biased, rights groups claim, The Gaurdian, 29
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Noordt, C., & Misuraca, G. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101714 · Cited by 356
Laux, J., Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2024) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12512 · Cited by 365
Digital government transformation in turbulent times: Responses, challenges, and future direction
Eom, S.-J., & Lee, J. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101690 · Cited by 328
Resnik, D. B., & Hosseini, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8 · Cited by 228
“If we do not understand how a telescope works, then we should not trust in what we see with it.”
Examining how AI capabilities can foster organizational performance in public organizations
Mikalef, P., Lemmer, K., Schaefer, C., Ylinen, M., Fjørtoft, S. O., Torvatn, H., Gupta, M., & Niehaves, B. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101797 · Cited by 255
Saeidnia, H. R., Fotami, S. G. H., Lund, B. D., & Ghiasi, N. (2024) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci13070381 · Cited by 227
Intelligence at the Extreme Edge: A Survey on Reformable TinyML
Rajapakse, V., Karunanayake, I., & Ahmed, N. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3583683 · Cited by 140
Maragno, G., Tangi, L., Gastaldi, L., & Benedetti, M. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102686 · Cited by 148
van Noordt, C., & Tangi, L. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101860 · Cited by 151
Ethical issues in the development of artificial intelligence: recognizing the risks
Kamila, M. K., & Jasrotia, S. S. (2023) · International Journal of Ethics and Systems · doi:10.1108/ijoes-05-2023-0107 · Cited by 157
Artificial intelligence in government: Concepts, standards, and a unified framework
Straub, V. J., Morgan, D., Bright, J., & Margetts, H. Z. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101881 · Cited by 154
Brasse, J., Broder, H. R., Förster, M., Klier, M., & Sigler, I. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00644-5 · Cited by 121
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A., Malgieri, G., Natali, C., Schneeberger, D., Stoeger, K., & Holzinger, A. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118888 · Cited by 89
Younisse, R., Ahmad, A., & Al-Haija, Q. S. A. (2022) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc6040126 · Cited by 82
Ali, M. N., Khan, T. I., Khattak, M. N., & Şener, İ. (2024) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100352 · Cited by 112
Nannini, L., Balayn, A., & Smith, A. L. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594074 · Cited by 101
Explanations, Fairness, and Appropriate Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Making
Schoeffer, J., De‐Arteaga, M., & Kühl, N. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642621 · Cited by 105
A review of evaluation approaches for explainable AI with applications in cardiology
Salih, A. M., Galazzo, I. B., Gkontra, P., Rauseo, E., Lee, A. M., Lekadir, K., Radeva, P. I., Petersen, S. E., & Menegaz, G. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10852-w · Cited by 82
Interpretable AI for bio-medical applications
Sathyan, A., Weinberg, A. I., & Cohen, K. D. O. (2022) · Complex Engineering Systems · doi:10.20517/ces.2022.41 · Cited by 70
The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-Making
Morrison, K., Spitzer, P., Turri, V., Feng, M., Kühl, N., & Perer, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3641022 · Cited by 86
Hamida, S. U., Chowdhury, M. J. M., Chakraborty, N. R., Biswas, K., & Sami, S. K. (2024) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc8110149 · Cited by 84
Explainability and white box in drug discovery
Kırboğa, K. K., Abbasi, S. W., & Küçüksille, E. U. (2023) · Chemical Biology & Drug Design · doi:10.1111/cbdd.14262 · Cited by 62
van Noordt, C., Medaglia, R., & Tangi, L. (2023) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/09520767231198411 · Cited by 84
Agriculture 5.0 and Explainable AI for Smart Agriculture: A Scoping Review
Razak, A., Yogarayan, S., Sayeed, M. S., & Derafi, M. I. F. M. (2024) · Emerging Science Journal · doi:10.28991/esj-2024-08-02-024 · Cited by 80
Reducing AI bias in recruitment and selection: an integrative grounded approach
Soleimani, M., Intezari, A. H., Arrowsmith, J., Pauleen, D. J., & Taşkın, N. (2025) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2025.2480617 · Cited by 101
Reviewing the role of AI in fraud detection and prevention in financial services
Odeyemi, O., Mhlongo, N. Z., Nwankwo, E. E., & Soyombo, O. T. (2024) · International Journal of Science and Research Archive · doi:10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.1.0279 · Cited by 85
Knowledge Graphs and Explainable AI in Healthcare
Rajabi, E., & Kafaie, S. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13100459 · Cited by 73
When code isn’t law: rethinking regulation for artificial intelligence
Judge, B., Nitzberg, M., & Russell, S. (2024) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1093/polsoc/puae020 · Cited by 91
Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Global Economy and Technology Advancements
Khan, M. A., Khan, H., Omer, M. F., Ullah, I., & Yasir, M. (2024) · Advanced technologies and societal change · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-3222-7_7 · Cited by 75
Tangi, L., Müller, A. P. R., & Janssen, M. (2025) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102055 · Cited by 88
Self-citationChandra, Y., & Feng, N. (2025) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2025.2450680 · Cited by 70
Olateju, O. O., Okon, S. U., Olaniyi, O. O., Samuel-Okon, A. D., & Asonze, C. U. (2024) · Journal of Engineering Research and Reports · doi:10.9734/jerr/2024/v26i71206 · Cited by 52
Human-Robot Teaming: Grand Challenges
Natarajan, M., Seraj, E., Altundas, B., Paleja, R., Ye, S., Chen, L., Jensen, R., Chang, K. C., & Gombolay, M. (2023) · Current Robotics Reports · doi:10.1007/s43154-023-00103-1 · Cited by 58
Aoki, N., Tatsumi, T., Naruse, G., & Maeda, K. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101965 · Cited by 75
Citizens’ intention to follow recommendations from a government-supported AI-enabled system
Wang, Y.-F., Chen, Y., & Chien, S.-Y. J. (2023) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/09520767231176126 · Cited by 48
The challenges of AI implementation in the public sector. An in-depth case studies analysis
Tangi, L., van Noordt, C., & Müller, A. P. R. (2023) · Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3598469.3598516 · Cited by 49
Balan, G. S., Kumar, V. S., & Raj, S. A. (2025) · Supply Chain Analytics · doi:10.1016/j.sca.2025.100121 · Cited by 68
Defending explicability as a principle for the ethics of artificial intelligence in medicine
Adams, J. (2023) · Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-023-10175-7 · Cited by 42
Elevating e-government: Unleashing the power of AI and IoT for enhanced public services
Al‐Ansi, A. M., Garad, A., Jaboob, M., & Al-Ansi, A. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40591 · Cited by 68
Automated decision-making and good administration: Views from inside the government machinery
Røhl, U. B. U. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101864 · Cited by 53
Xie, X., & Yan, J. (2024) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2024.103408 · Cited by 38
The role of AI in detecting and mitigating human errors in safety-critical industries: A review
Gursel, E., Madadi, M., Coble, J. B., Agarwal, V., Yadav, V., Boring, R. L., & Khojandi, A. (2024) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110682 · Cited by 44
Madathil, A. P., Luo, X., Liu, Q., Walker, C., Madarkar, R., Cai, Y., Liu, Z., Chang, W., & Qin, Y. (2024) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-023-02266-2 · Cited by 35
Hao, X., Demir, E., & Eyers, D. R. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101152 · Cited by 44
Why we do need explainable AI for healthcare
Cinà, G., Röber, T. E., Goedhart, R., & Birbil, Ş. İ. (2025) · Diagnostic and Prognostic Research · doi:10.1186/s41512-025-00209-4 · Cited by 41
Agbabiaka, O., Ojo, A., & Connolly, N. (2025) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124076 · Cited by 60
Painting the Black Box White: Experimental Findings from Applying XAI to an ECG Reading Setting
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A., Natali, C., Parimbelli, E., Ronzio, L., & Cameli, M. (2023) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make5010017 · Cited by 37
Automated Government Benefits and Welfare Surveillance
Zajko, M. (2023) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v21i3.16107 · Cited by 34
Weitz, K., Schlagowski, R., André, E., Männiste, M., & Dr.George, C. M. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642563 · Cited by 27
Artificial Intelligence Risks and Algorithmic Regulation
Fortes, P. R. B., Baquero, P. M., & Amariles, D. R. (2022) · European Journal of Risk Regulation · doi:10.1017/err.2022.14 · Cited by 32
A step toward building a unified framework for managing AI bias
Rana, S. A., Azizul, Z. H., & Awan, A. A. (2023) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1630 · Cited by 23
What drives the performance of tax administrations? Evidence from selected european countries
Milosavljević, M., Radovanović, S., & Delibasic, B. (2023) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106217 · Cited by 20
Using artificial intelligence to identify administrative errors in unemployment insurance
Young, M., Himmelreich, J., Honcharov, D., & Soundarajan, S. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101758 · Cited by 28
Zharova, A. (2023) · Journal of Digital Technologies and Law · doi:10.21202/jdtl.2023.42 · Cited by 23
Mapping the landscape of ethical considerations in explainable AI research
Nannini, L., Manerba, M. M., & Beretta, I. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09773-7 · Cited by 33
The impact of artificial intelligence on corporate ESG greenwashing
Cheng, Z., & Yang, G. W. (2025) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.seps.2025.102351 · Cited by 20
Bao, A., & Zeng, Y. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02759-2 · Cited by 18
Inclusive Technology Co-design for Participatory AI
Ahrweiler, P., Späth, E., García, J. M. S., Capellas, B. L., & Wurster, D. (2025) · Artificial intelligence, simulation and society · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71678-2_2 · Cited by 30
Valle-Cruz, D., Gil-García, J. R., & Sandoval‐Almazán, R. (2024) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781802207347.00010 · Cited by 19
Lammert, O., Richter, B., Schütze, C., Thommes, K., & Wrede, B. (2024) · Frontiers in Behavioral Economics · doi:10.3389/frbhe.2024.1377075 · Cited by 22
Explainable AI: A Neurally-Inspired Decision Stack Framework
Khan, M. S., Nayebpour, M., Li, M., El‐Amine, H., Koizumi, N., & Olds, J. L. (2022) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics7030127 · Cited by 19
Toward explainable artificial intelligence: A survey and overview on their intrinsic properties
Mi, J., Jiang, X., Luo, L., & Gao, Y. (2023) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126919 · Cited by 18
Explainable Product Classification for Customs
Lee, E., Kim, S., Kim, S., Jung, S., Kim, H., & Cha, M. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3635158 · Cited by 23
Misra, S., Katz, B., Roberts, P. S., Carney, M., & Valdivia, I. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101962 · Cited by 16
The EPOCH of AI: Human-Machine Complementarities at WorkPreprint
Loaiza, I., & C, R. R. B. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5028371 · Cited by 25
Mitigating Cyber Threats: Machine Learning and Explainable AI for Phishing Detection
Akhtar, H. M. U., Nauman, M. A., Akhtar, N., Hameed, M., Hameed, S., & Tareen, M. Z. (2025) · VFAST Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.21015/vtse.v13i2.2129 · Cited by 18
Wang, C., Yin, Y., & Hu, H. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103264 · Cited by 34
Conversation Starters: How Can We Misunderstand AI Better?
Nicenboim, I. P., Venkat, S., Rustad, N. L., Vardanyan, D., Giaccardi, E., & Redström, J. (2023) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3544549.3583914 · Cited by 14
Framework for human–XAI symbiosis: extended self from the dual-process theory perspective
Litvinova, Y., Mikalef, P., & Luo, X. R. (2024) · Journal of Business Analytics · doi:10.1080/2573234x.2024.2396366 · Cited by 16
Reimagining libraries in the AI era: ethical AI literacy and human-centered strategies
Michalak, R., & Ellixson, D. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02827-4 · Cited by 13
Why Is the Current XAI Not Meeting the Expectations?
Malizia, A., & Paternò, F. (2023) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3588313 · Cited by 16
Explanation needs and ethical demands: unpacking the instrumental value of XAI
Alpsancar, S., Buhl, H. M., Matzner, T., & Scharlau, I. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00622-3 · Cited by 17
Salah, M., Alnoor, A., Abdelfattah, F., Dahleez, K. A., Sinawi, S. A., Hussein, J. S., Bareas, A. K., Ismail, M. M., & Halbusi, H. A. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100899 · Cited by 17
Rizk, A., & Lindgren, I. (2025) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102061 · Cited by 36
Dahish, Z., Miah, S. J., Pandit, A., & Roy, S. K. (2025) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2025.2540267 · Cited by 14
Artificial Intelligence in migrant health: a critical perspective on opportunities and risks
Matlin, S. A., Claron, I. M. M., Merone, J., Netto, G., Takian, A., Zaman, M. H., & Saso, L. (2025) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101421 · Cited by 16
Nullius in Explanans: an ethical risk assessment for explainable AI
Nannini, L., Huyskes, D., Panai, E., Pistilli, G., & Tartaro, A. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09800-7 · Cited by 16
Algorithm Registers: A Box-Ticking Exercise or Meaningful Tool for Transparency?
Nieuwenhuizen, E. (2024) · Information Polity · doi:10.1177/15701255241297107 · Cited by 20
Nimmy, S. F., Hussain, O. K., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Saha, S. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113333 · Cited by 15
AI for large-scale evacuation modeling: promises and challenges
Sun, Y., Zhao, X., Lovreglio, R., & Kuligowski, E. D. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-824073-1.00014-9 · Cited by 12
Automated Decision-Making in the Public Sector: A Multidisciplinary Literature Review
Rizk, A., & Lindgren, I. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_15 · Cited by 15
Good practices and common pitfalls of machine learning in nutrition research
Kirk, D. (2024) · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665124007638 · Cited by 11
Computing and Modeling After COVID-19: More Responsible, Less Technical
Nabavi, E. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2022.3218738 · Cited by 11
Young People Learning About Algorithms: Five Profiles Spanning From Ineptitude to Enchantment
Brites, M. J., Castro, T. S., Müller, M. S., & Maneta, M. (2024) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.8272 · Cited by 14
A Literature Review of Covid-19 Research: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
Guenduez, A. A., & Walker, N. (2024) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2024.2332618 · Cited by 12
Integral system safety for machine learning in the public sector: An empirical account
Delfos, J., Zuiderwijk, A., van Cranenburgh, S., Chorus, C. G., & Dobbe, R. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101963 · Cited by 12
Explainable AI: definition and attributes of a good explanation for health AI
Kyrimi, E., McLachlan, S., Wohlgemut, J. M., Perkins, Z., Lagnado, D. A., Marsh, W., the ExAIDSS Expert Group, Gimson, A. E., Shafti, A., Ercole, A., et al. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00668-x · Cited by 13
Parviainen, J., Koski, A., Eilola, L., Palukka, H., Kuusipalo, P., & Lindholm, C. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14030178 · Cited by 13
A socio-technical framework for AI trust in public administration
Tsarouhas, P., & Grigoriadis, K. (2025) · Transforming Government People Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/tg-06-2025-0157 · Cited by 9
Four facets of AI transparency
Larsson, S., Haresamudram, K., Högberg, C., Lao, Y., Nyström, A., & Söderlund, K. (2023) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781803928562.00047 · Cited by 9
Batra, I. (2024) · Journal of Electrical Systems · doi:10.52783/jes.2000 · Cited by 10
AI-Driven Fraud Detection and Prevention in Decentralized Finance
Narayan, M., Shukla, P., & Kanth, R. K. (2024) · Advances in finance, accounting, and economics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-6321-8.ch004 · Cited by 8
Camilleri, M. A. (2026) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124710 · Cited by 10
The principle of AI explainability and its application within organizations
Steyer, V., & Vuarin, L. (2023) · Réseaux · doi:10.3917/res.240.0179 · Cited by 8
Liu, H., Han, X., Li, S., Lin, W., & Zhang, M. (2025) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-12-2024-0957 · Cited by 7
A Review of AI in Human-Machine Cooperation: Machine Perspective
Sourav, M. S. G., Javaid, A. Y., & Cheng, L. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems · doi:10.1145/3774318 · Cited by 10
Student voices: synergising artificial and human intelligence in health science education
Hu, P. Z., Qiu, C., Wang, A., Xu, S., Ye, J., Zou, J., Liu, S., Yuan, W., & Lv, J. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08545-1 · Cited by 7
Explainable AI in Disease Diagnosis
Bedi, P., Thukral, A., & Dhiman, S. (2024) · Computational intelligence methods and applications · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-3705-5_5 · Cited by 7
Abrokwah-Larbi, K. (2025) · Discover Internet of Things · doi:10.1007/s43926-025-00092-x · Cited by 7
Clement, J., Ren, Y., & Curley, S. P. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3961156 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- de Bruijn, H., Warnier, M., & Janssen, M.
- Affiliations
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Janssen, Marijn
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101666
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205177168
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 15
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Government Information Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Keywords
- explainable AI, algorithmic decision-making, algorithmic transparency, public trust in AI, wicked problems, automated decision-making, government AI policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review