Cited by 101E-Government and Public ServicesEthics and Social Impacts of AISmart Cities and Technologies

Artificial Intelligence for data-driven decision-making and governance in public affairs

Charles, Vincent, Rana, Nripendra P., Carter, Lemuria·2022·Government Information Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101742

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charles, V., Rana, N. P., & Carter, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Bradford (GB)
  • Qatar University (QA)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Rana, Nripendra P.
Venue
Government Information Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
101742
ISSN
0740-624X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286449686
Cited by
101
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3
FWCI
55.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Government Information Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
artificial intelligence in public administration, data-driven decision making, public governance, AI governance, AI risks, citizen privacy, citizen satisfaction, public value creation, AI ethics, AI implementation challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review