Cited by 108Climate Change, Adaptation, MigrationMigration and Labor DynamicsLand Rights and Reforms

Soil quality and human migration in Kenya and Uganda

Open access
Gray, Clark L.·2011·Global Environmental Change

Abstract

Soil degradation is widely considered to be a key factor undermining agricultural livelihoods in the developing world and contributing to rural out-migration. To date, however, few quantitative studies have examined the effects of soil characteristics on human migration or other social outcomes for potentially vulnerable households. This study takes advantage of a unique longitudinal survey dataset from Kenya and Uganda containing information on household-level soil properties to investigate the effects of soil quality on population mobility. Random effects multinomial logit models are used to test for effects of soil quality on both temporary and permanent migration while accounting for a variety of potential confounders. The analysis reveals that soil quality significantly reduces migration in Kenya, particularly for temporary labor migration, but marginally increases migration in Uganda. These findings are consistent with several previous studies in showing that adverse environmental conditions tend to increase migration but not universally, contrary to common assumptions about environmentally-induced migration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.02.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diminished soil quality in Kenya has led people to travel to diversify their income.

    “Diminished soil quality in Kenya has led people to travel to diversify their income.”

    From Migration as adaptation (2011) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Discussion reports a strong association in Kenya between low soil quality and temporary labor migration, and suggests that households send migrants to generate additional income. The claim presents this suggested response as an established causal effect; the paper does not establish that diminished soil quality caused people to migrate. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In 2004-05, temporary labour migration in households farming high-quality soils in Kenya was 67% lower than in those using poor soils.

    “In 2004-05, for example, temporary labour migration in households that were farming land with high-quality soils was 67% lower than in those using poor soils 4 .”

    From Migration as adaptation (2011) · cites this paper as [4]

    Results §5.1 (Kenya; page not provided) reports that the odds of temporary labor migration were 67% lower for households with high-quality soil. The citing sentence presents this as a 67% reduction in migration itself, rather than in its odds. Data Collection §3.1 also says the Kenyan surveys were conducted in 2004 and 2007, not 2004–05. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 108

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Matsumoto T Yamano T Nyoro J 2008 Intensification of maize production in Kenya and Uganda Centre for the Study of African Economies Conference Oxford March 16–18 http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/conferences/2008-EDiA/papers/256-Matsumoto.pdf

Authors
Gray, C. L.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Gray, Clark L.
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
421-430
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981379365
Cited by
108
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
25.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
  • National Institutes of Health (2r24hd050924-06)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24 HD-050924, K99HD061752)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
Keywords
soil quality, soil degradation, human migration, rural exodus, temporary labour migration, permanent migration, household vulnerability, agricultural livelihoods, Kenya, Uganda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review