The DOI matches its Crossref record; 147 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map
Open accessAbstract
The analysis of data from social media and social networking sites may be instrumental in achieving a better understanding of human-environment interactions and in shaping future conservation and environmental management. In this study, we systematically map the application of social media data in environmental research. The quantitative review of 169 studies reveals that most studies focus on the analysis of people’s behavior and perceptions of the environment, followed by environmental monitoring and applications in environmental planning and governance. The literature testifies to a very rapid growth in the field, with Twitter (52 studies) and Flickr (34 studies) being most frequently used as data sources. A growing number of studies combine data from multiple sites and jointly investigates multiple types of media. A broader, more qualitative review of the insights provided by the investigated studies suggests that while social media data offer unprecedented opportunities in terms of data volume, scale of analysis, and real-time monitoring, researchers are only starting to cope with the challenges of data’s heterogeneity and noise levels, potential biases, ethics of data acquisition and use, and uncertainty about future data availability. Critical areas for the development of the field include integration of different types of information in data mashups, development of quality assurance procedures and ethical codes, improved integration with existing methods, and assurance of long-term, free and easy-to-access provision of public social media data for future environmental researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography
Goodchild, M. F. (2007) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y · Cited by 4,522
A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities
Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5 · Cited by 1,398
Guidelines for systematic review in Conservation and environmental management
PULLIN, A. S., & STEWART, G. B. (2006) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x · Cited by 1,137
Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., & Sui, D. Z. (2012) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.595657 · Cited by 863
Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreation
Wood, S. A., Guerry, A. D., Silver, J. M., & Lacayo, M. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02976 · Cited by 720
Mapping the global value and distribution of coral reef tourism
Spalding, M., Burke, L., Wood, S. A., Ashpole, J., Hutchison, J., & zu Ermgassen, P. (2017) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.014 · Cited by 698
Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity
Kryvasheyeu, Y., Chen, H., Obradovich, N., Moro, E., Van Hentenryck, P., Fowler, J., & Cebrian, M. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500779 · Cited by 637
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghermandi, A., & Sinclair, M.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 55
- Pages
- 36-47
- ISSN
- 0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912544980
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 147
- FWCI
- 194.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.003
- The paper
- Ghermandi, A., & Sinclair, M. (2019). Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map. Global Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.