Cited by 153Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate Change, Adaptation, MigrationClimate Change Communication and Perception

Weaponizing Vulnerability to Climate Change

Thomas, Kimberley Anh, Warner, Benjamin P.·2019·Global Environmental Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101928

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, K. A., & Warner, B. P.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Kimberley Anh
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
57
Pages
101928
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951745010
Cited by
153
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Keywords
climate change vulnerability, climate change adaptation, precarity, social exclusion, climate equity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review