The resilience of Amazon tree cover to past and present drying
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Past drought periods also coincided with cooler temperatures, which probably reduced water demand by trees.
“However, these periods also coincided with cooler temperatures20,21, which probably reduced water demand by trees30.”
From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
Citation 30 is attached to the suggestion that cooler temperatures reduced trees’ water demand; the preceding citations support the timing of cooler temperatures. The Introduction discusses mid-Holocene drying and tree-cover resilience, but the passages retrieved for cooler temperatures, water demand, and evapotranspiration do not address that proposed effect. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDuring the Last Glacial Maximum and mid-Holocene, forests persisted even when humans were already present in the landscape.
“More recently, during the drier and cooler conditions of the Last Glacial Maximum20 (LGM) (around 21,000 years ago) and of the mid-Holocene epoch21 (around 6,000 years ago), forests persisted even when humans were already present in the landscape22.”
From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
The Introduction (p. 2) says the paper examines central and western Amazon tree cover under drier mid-Holocene conditions, but the passages available do not establish that forests persisted while humans were present. Searches for human presence, anthropogenic activity, forest persistence, and the Last Glacial Maximum found no passage addressing that conjunction. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire
Bond, W. J., Woodward, F. I., & Midgley, G. F. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01252.x · Cited by 1,942 · see citing works
What Limits Trees in C<sub>4</sub> Grasslands and Savannas?
Bond, W. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173411 · Cited by 909 · see citing works
Nepstad, D. C., Stickler, C. M., Filho, B. S., & Merry, F. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.0036 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Power, M. J., Marlon, J., Ortiz, N., Bartlein, P. J., Harrison, S. P., Mayle, F. E., Ballouche, A., Bradshaw, R. H. W., Carcaillet, C., Cordova, C., et al. (2008) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-007-0334-x · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points
Armstrong McKay, D. I., Staal, A., Abrams, J. F., Winkelmann, R., Sakschewski, B., Loriani, S., Fetzer, I., Cornell, S. E., Rockström, J., & Lenton, T. M. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn7950 · Cited by 1,931 · see citing works
Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system
Flores, B. M., Montoya, E., Sakschewski, B., Nascimento, N., Staal, A., Betts, R. A., Levis, C., Lapola, D. M., Esquível-Muelbert, A., Jakovac, C., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06970-0 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kukla, T., Ahlström, A., Maezumi, S. Y., Chevalier, M., Lu, Z., Winnick, M. J., & Chamberlain, C. P.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Lund University (SE)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kukla, Tyler
- Venue
- Global and Planetary Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 202
- Pages
- 103520
- ISSN
- 0921-8181 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3162199618
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 328 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Global and Planetary Change (acceptedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
- Keywords
- aridification, drought resilience, vegetation-climate feedback, mid-Holocene, fire, deforestation, grassland encroachment, pollen, charcoal, speleothem oxygen isotopes, LPJ-GUESS, future precipitation projections, anthropogenic land use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review